Skip to comments.
Prebiotic Soup--Revisiting the Miller Experiment [biogenesis]
Science Magazine ^
| May 2003
| Jeffrey L. Bada and Antonio Lazcano
Posted on 11/02/2003 10:30:46 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-307 next last
To: PatrickHenry
Yeah, this is monstorously out of date.
The newest theories that have been conjured up deal with self-catalyzing RNA. But there's a problem--this RNA is way to advanced and way to irreducible to have been present before even advanced biological organisms. And that RNA only folds minute times and doesn't push forward reactions, etc.
What that science article doesn't mention--and anyone can reference this by the sparse stories of abiotic orgins--is how increasingly unlikely abiogenesis appears to be on this planet.
I love it: now the prevailing theory is that life came from meteorites--and somehow the planet that spawned that life not only had more favorable conditions than Earth but also had achiral (L) organic molecules. It all comes down to faith for abiogenesis. Pass the buck.
This is not to say that someday we will never be able to synthesize life, however.
21
posted on
11/02/2003 2:30:41 PM PST
by
Loc123
To: PatrickHenry
Oh, and what a difference, Placemarker
22
posted on
11/02/2003 5:31:18 PM PST
by
Ogmios
(Since when is 66 senate votes for judicial confirmations constitutional?)
To: Ogmios
I believe that if they run experiments that closely resemble what the smokestacks at the ocean floors are like, they might come up with some better luck. I was thinking along the same lines. The Urey-Miller apparatus with a lot of different minerals, some submerged, some at the water-atmosphere boundary.
To: BiffWondercat
"What about the chemistry of 'black smokers' and geothermal vents in the deep oceans? "![](http://i.imdb.com/Photos/Mptv/1004/1862_0035.jpg)
It's going to take a lot of tap dancing to get me to believe DNA spontaneously came together. Black Smokers not withstanding.
24
posted on
11/02/2003 5:43:31 PM PST
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: Loc123
I love it: now the prevailing theory is that life came from meteorites The prevailing theory is that life happened on the mudball you are standing on.
25
posted on
11/02/2003 5:49:09 PM PST
by
donh
(1)
To: DannyTN
It's going to take a lot of tap dancing to get me to believe DNA spontaneously came together. Good thing that's not on the agenda, then. All contemporary theories of any passing scientific gravity hold that life evolved gradually, from it's beginnings through the present moment.
26
posted on
11/02/2003 5:51:59 PM PST
by
donh
(1)
To: donh
"All contemporary theories of any passing scientific gravity hold that life evolved gradually, from it's beginnings through the present moment. "Somebody certainly passed that theory.
27
posted on
11/02/2003 5:58:43 PM PST
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: DannyTN
Well, you have to work with what you've got and work backwards.
You can't start right from the beginning and hope you get it right, you have to start where you are and move back.
We're here, so scientifically we have to assume that life came together here as well, therefore, we move back until we get stuck, then we figure that out and keep going until we get stuck again and so on and so forth.
Right now, we are looking at a number of different hypothesis regarding the beginnings of life, the smokestacks at this point give us some of the most promising elements that we need to give us an actual starting point.
But the fact is that we can't start from the beginning, we have to start from the now and work our way back to the then.
28
posted on
11/02/2003 6:06:43 PM PST
by
Ogmios
(Since when is 66 senate votes for judicial confirmations constitutional?)
To: Virginia-American
I think the pressure, the temperature etc, can create some very complicated structures, and I think that it is what holds the most promise. The minerals are there, a very regular and unchanging environment are there, etc.
I think that in order for life to start, it had to have a very stable environment, and I think the smokers are it. Their environment is about as stable as you can wish for, then as evolution kicked in, the stability of the organisms themselves changed as they moved farther and farther from the stable environment in which they were born.
Excess energy has a strange way of turning elements into more complex elements, mixing and combining in certain ways etc, and the environment certainly seems right for the pressure, temperature, stability, and most of all the elements themselves to slowly turn more complex.
29
posted on
11/02/2003 6:12:20 PM PST
by
Ogmios
(Since when is 66 senate votes for judicial confirmations constitutional?)
To: DannyTN
Somebody certainly passed that theory. Creationists keep trying to pass off spontaneous abiogensis of cellular DNA-based life as a scientific theory so they can have something to refute with technical sounding bogus statistical calculations.
30
posted on
11/02/2003 6:13:53 PM PST
by
donh
(1)
To: Ogmios
I wonder if there are the equivalent of smokers under the ice of Europa and other Jovian moons. They're heated internally by tidal stresses.
To: donh
Whether it's pondscum happens slowly or pondscum happens quickly. It's still "Pondscum happens"
32
posted on
11/02/2003 6:23:52 PM PST
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: Virginia-American
Actually, I wouldn't doubt it, and exobiology is fast becoming the next big biological profession.
A lifeform that would live near such a smoker needs nothing more then the heat and output of the smokers, and of course if it is near the top of the foodchain it's smokestack neighbors. Jupiter itself and the tidal stresses that it puts on it's satelites would really be all the energy necassaary to create the situation.
I would love to send a probe to Europa and dig in and see if theres liquid under there, the cracking etc makes it seem likely, and if possible to dive into that ocean and see if there are simple or even possibly more advanced lifeforms under the ice.
33
posted on
11/02/2003 6:24:05 PM PST
by
Ogmios
(Since when is 66 senate votes for judicial confirmations constitutional?)
To: DannyTN
It's going to take a lot of tap dancing to get me to believe DNA spontaneously came together. Black Smokers not withstanding.DNA came much later. RNA (or possibly a simpler RNA analogue) came first.
The process of abiogenesis had many steps that must be explained, and these holes in our knowledge are slowly (but surely) being filled. So those of us who are unafraid of the science see each new discovery & say, "fascinating, good work!" While you who are afraid of us finding how life got started get another chance to say "yeah but look at all the problems that remain over here!"
Interesting how one side of the debate always ends up cheering each new discovery or intriguing theory, while the other side always gets nervous at new discoveries.
34
posted on
11/02/2003 6:24:50 PM PST
by
jennyp
(http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
To: Virginia-American; Ogmios
35
posted on
11/02/2003 6:25:35 PM PST
by
donh
(1)
To: DannyTN
Whether it's pondscum happens slowly or pondscum happens quickly. It's still "Pondscum happens" Indeed. And in like manner, so do creatures like oysters, otters, and orangutangs happen, in the long, slow march toward humans.
36
posted on
11/02/2003 6:29:16 PM PST
by
donh
(1)
To: Ogmios
"Well, you have to work with what you've got "And even when you've got nothing, their's always imagination.
37
posted on
11/02/2003 6:35:34 PM PST
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: donh
That's probably where I got that idea then, Callisto? Hadn't heard about that one.
The next 10 years or so are going to be very exciting.
Who needs Extraterrestrials, when there might be other life within our own Solar System, and then what happens to the chances of finding more life outside the Solar system if indeed the moons of jupiter hold their own lifeforms?
Oh yes, very exciting..
38
posted on
11/02/2003 6:37:10 PM PST
by
Ogmios
(Since when is 66 senate votes for judicial confirmations constitutional?)
To: DannyTN
Science never works from nothing, I have no idea where you get this from.
Science comes up with a hypothesis, and then tests it and tests it.
That's what all of these abiogenesis hypothesis are all about, we come up with plausible scenarios, and then see if there is anything to them, when they check out, make predictions, help us study other phenomonon, then they become theories.
None of us are sold on any particular hypothesis regarding Abiogenesis, but it sure is fun to contemplate and kick around.
39
posted on
11/02/2003 6:39:53 PM PST
by
Ogmios
(Since when is 66 senate votes for judicial confirmations constitutional?)
To: DannyTN
Well timed pic!
I just find it facinating to have such a biosphere in such adverse conditions. I would think that the protiens organized before DNA/RNA started getting into the business.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-307 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson