Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You're Too Late: They're Everywhere
The wit and wisdom of Adam Teiichi Yoshida ^ | Thursday, October 30, 2003 | Adam Teiichi Yoshida

Posted on 10/30/2003 4:06:40 PM PST by Lazamataz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last
To: Lazamataz
No, -- I'm wondering how you can be rabblerousing for internment camps, given the family history you talked about on Chancys 'Jooo hating' thread today.
61 posted on 10/30/2003 5:10:48 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but Arnie won, & politics as usual lost. Yo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: All
Those horrible fires or not we are at war on two fronts with a coalition of enemies, foreign and domestic.

Those Mosques which preach Jihad against America . . .need to be closed down and the Clerics who run them interned for the duration of the war. . . Known supporters of terrorism, of Osama Bin Laden, of al-Qaeda, of Hamas, of Hezbollah, and of any other Islamist group need to be interned for the duration of the war.

Uh oh! Some will wince at that. How dare we deny Constitution rights! It's better we lose our Country. Go figure. So.. like we don't have rights to defend our country?

There's so many good things to emphasize that I'd have to copy most of the article. So I'll just give my thoughts. Supporters of radical Islam are not limited to Muslims. Not all crippling of America requires violent attacks.

There are many reasons we lost the Vietnam war at home while our forces and allies won every battle in Vietnam.

One of those reasons is the support the Communists received from our leftists. Indeed, the North Vietnamese Communists praised the American press as their "most valuable guerilla."

IMO we cannot win the war defending against radical Islam without winning the cultural war also. Look how the left tries to destroy this wartime administration just as they did a generation ago.

Yes, the left has "constitutional" rights to destroy whatever and whoever -- at least they have inalienable rights. We have rights too. We have constitutional and inalienable rights to defend our Country. It's a clash of rights. That means war. Power and will determine whose rights prevail and who survives to dictate what America will be after the wars. The time for polite discussion about "rights" is over. This is war.

We cannot lose these wars. They are for all the marbles.

62 posted on 10/30/2003 5:11:51 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MARTIAL MONK
"Maybe we should round up all the Injuns and put them on a reservation."

Hey, just because some eye witnesses saw two guys starting one of the fires is no reason to express the fear that maybe the fires were started by terrorists. I think we should all remain skeptical of this possibility until at least another 300,000 square miles of timber are burned, and a small army of arsonists wearing turbans and carrying flame throwers is spotted by eye witnesses.

63 posted on 10/30/2003 5:15:50 PM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"I propose the internment of that minority of Moslems which sympathizers with the aims of Radical Islam, those who would join with the enemies of America in the destruction of America. "

Technically this should read "those who advocate the violent overthrow of the government".

Of course those people should be arrested- not just "interned".

I don't see who he wants to intern.
He doesn't say- unless he means those who should be arrested for treason. They are the only ones who would practically fit his standard.

64 posted on 10/30/2003 5:16:07 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
No, -- I'm wondering how you can be rabblerousing for internment camps, given the family history you talked about on Chancys 'Jooo hating' thread today.

Internment camps for people expressing solidarity with an avowed enemy? During a war? Sure. Worked pretty well in WWII, for the Italian-Americans and German-Americans who expressed solidarity with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany.

For the record, I'm entirely against the Japanese internment camps of the same era -- they rounded up all Japanese, regardless of a lack of expressed solidarity with the Empire of Japan.

So, I take if from your initial 'no' that you do not believe the SoCal fires to be the work of Al-Qaeda -- and from that earlier post, not the work of environmentalists as well.

65 posted on 10/30/2003 5:17:13 PM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I've got the will, you've got the will and a lot of other Freepers have the will, but our politicians don't have the will, the guts or the inclination.
66 posted on 10/30/2003 5:17:17 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I got no problem with the solution, but if you're looking for a scapegoat for the LA fires, try the enviornmentalists

Al Quada, ELF, ANSWER, Sierra Club - they're all after the same goal when you think about it. IMHO, of course.

67 posted on 10/30/2003 5:18:11 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I never thought much about it until I heard a reporter make a statement, something like: " California is on fire everywhere north of the border."

Considering that the brush and landscape along the Pacific coast is pretty much the same in Mexico as in the USA, I wondered, why is it burning here and not there? Not that I wished the same suffering upon them, but just a simple generic: why?
68 posted on 10/30/2003 5:20:59 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (If you seen yourself as other people do, you'd laugh too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Firstly, if they were terrorist acts, they were inept terrorist acts. They started them in the wrong places!.

If **I** were to select places to begin terrorist wildfires, I would not conveniently locate them so that they affected only relatively sparsely populated and wealthy communities. I'd make sure they hopped the freeways, which almost none of them did.

Secondly, internment is not necessary. Revoking the visas of ALL citizens of terrorist-supporting Muslim states--followed by rounding up and mass deportations--would suffice.

--Boris

69 posted on 10/30/2003 5:21:41 PM PST by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
I never thought much about it until I heard a reporter make a statement, something like: " California is on fire everywhere north of the border." Considering that the brush and landscape along the Pacific coast is pretty much the same in Mexico as in the USA, I wondered, why is it burning here and not there? Not that I wished the same suffering upon them, but just a simple generic: why?

Actually, Glen Beck had a wonderful answer to this: Because, in Mexico, all deadwood is collected and used for fireplaces and cooking pits.

Here, we let it sit.

70 posted on 10/30/2003 5:23:04 PM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Its never combustible - it only gets paper thin.

I'm not going to how you found that out.

71 posted on 10/30/2003 5:24:38 PM PST by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: boris
Firstly, if they were terrorist acts, they were inept terrorist acts. They started them in the wrong places!. If **I** were to select places to begin terrorist wildfires, I would not conveniently locate them so that they affected only relatively sparsely populated and wealthy communities. I'd make sure they hopped the freeways, which almost none of them did.

Well, that's a strike against the terrorist theory.

Secondly, internment is not necessary. Revoking the visas of ALL citizens of terrorist-supporting Muslim states--followed by rounding up and mass deportations--would suffice.

I don't agree with doing that. People who are good and honest would be swept up in this act.

72 posted on 10/30/2003 5:25:05 PM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"The execution was luck. The planning and conception was simply, brilliant."

Diabolical is a better word. Osamma's 9-11 plan only appeared to be 'brilliant' because few in America were evil enough to comprehend such an attack, let alone prevent it. I hope that what we have learned about our enemy is that the 'brains' behind his operation are not the human form, they get their inspiration from a darker form of intellect. We have forgotten that evil exists, and we have been reminded that it is alive and well.

73 posted on 10/30/2003 5:29:18 PM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
We are seeing and hearing this week from our President on a variety of subjects. One in particular he chided us about the fact that he "felt" the American people were not ready to come out strongly on Abortion. Does this reflect your position on this barbaric proceedure? Yes I know he said he would sign the bill banning abortion and all that but this is just posturing. I personally feel he should feel the heat of true Americans on the issue of the wholesale Murder of the Innocent;it is much more of a issue than they maket out to be.

Second; his love affair with islam is raising eyebrows all over and if he follows suit like he has on other subjects he will probably say something to the effect that he feels the American people would not agree with a heavy handed approach in whacking islam because it is after all a religion of peace! I know your response to this one and I hope all the real Americans will scream their heads off until he hears the message loud and clear. He is not his Imperial Majesty yet and is subject to the will of the people who elected him. This is my official position Mr. President; stop pandering to our enemies and realize the error of your flawed policy in regards to islam. These are Terrorists out to cut your head off Sir! and I for one am tired of all this silliness and dangerous nonsense with our enemies who daily threatten to attack us in the name of islam. One day they will succeed in a big way for all the B.S. (Bovine Scatology) you love to spread around. Be a real hero And defend America not our avowed Enemy lurking and tolerated in the homeland!

74 posted on 10/30/2003 5:31:04 PM PST by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
bump
75 posted on 10/30/2003 5:35:17 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Virtue untested is innocence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
had to shatter the psyche of a kid over a report card - I blew my voice out

I had to do that one time when I brought a new dog home and he and another woke me by fighting in the middle of the night. I couldn't speak for 2 days but the dogs never fought again.

76 posted on 10/30/2003 5:35:37 PM PST by Flyer (You get more with a smile, a kind word and a gun than with a smile and a kind word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
BUMP
77 posted on 10/30/2003 5:42:20 PM PST by GrandMoM ("Without prayer, the hand of GOD stops, BUT, with prayer the hand of GOD moves !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Get a grip.
Some loonie theorized it was terrorists, and you've overreacted.

End of story.
78 posted on 10/30/2003 5:42:56 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but Arnie won, & politics as usual lost. Yo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Get a grip. Some loonie theorized it was terrorists, and you've overreacted.

LOL! As I expected, you make it personal, trying to bait. :o)

Is this the part where I'm supposed to get all upset and post a half a dozen expletive-filled messages for your further amusement. ;^)

79 posted on 10/30/2003 5:44:53 PM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Saying you've over-reacted is personal? Whatever..

I forgot you were so sensitive.
80 posted on 10/30/2003 5:50:54 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but Arnie won, & politics as usual lost. Yo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson