Skip to comments.
Exotic Relics Found In Ancient Nomads' Tombs In Inner Mongolia (Westerners)
China View ^
| 10-28-2003
Posted on 10/28/2003 10:23:26 AM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
10/28/2003 10:23:27 AM PST
by
blam
To: farmfriend
2
posted on
10/28/2003 10:28:09 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
3
posted on
10/28/2003 10:29:17 AM PST
by
blam
To: shamusotoole
4
posted on
10/28/2003 10:34:46 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam

This is the region where the latest Western artifacts were found
5
posted on
10/28/2003 10:36:58 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
This is facinating.
6
posted on
10/28/2003 10:38:47 AM PST
by
najida
(This is a great big sandbox for us all to play in. Don't tinkle in it.)
To: blam; billbears; 4ConservativeJustices; Quix
The Ten Lost Tribes went somewhere--about this time...
7
posted on
10/28/2003 10:38:56 AM PST
by
Ff--150
(we have been fed with milk, not meat)
To: blam
I could see how these particular artifacts could make their way to China fairly rapidly, as high-end trade goods. We already know that there was apparently a good bit of interaction and trade among peoples and tribes in Asia, so this sorta fits right in.
8
posted on
10/28/2003 10:44:48 AM PST
by
r9etb
To: blam
Seems that the modern world is rediscovering these Kelts all over again. A 150+ year-old history text I have describes these fellers and their migrations extensively.
I saw a PBS special about some of the mummies three years ago, and figured I'd see if there was any previous documentation... yep.
Not to detract from the recent finds...but the existence of Kelts in China and Mongolia is old, old news.
9
posted on
10/28/2003 10:56:20 AM PST
by
dasboot
(Celebrate UNITY!)
To: dasboot
"Not to detract from the recent finds...but the existence of Kelts in China and Mongolia is old, old news." Yup. But, you probably never heard anyone say that they were refugees from Noah's Flood in the Black Sea in 5600BC...or, that the Schytians were the same people as the Xiongnu, Han, Hun and Hakka Chinese...and, maybe even the Picts.
10
posted on
10/28/2003 11:07:47 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam; Ff--150
But, you probably never heard anyone say that they were refugees from Noah's Flood in the Black Sea in 5600BC...or, that the Schytians were the same people as the Xiongnu, Han, Hun and Hakka Chinese...and, maybe even the Picts.Blam, I am always amazed by your posts! Could they be part of the 10 Lost Tribes?
11
posted on
10/28/2003 11:12:52 AM PST
by
4CJ
(Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
To: blam; *Gods, Graves, Glyphs; Alas Babylon!; annyokie; bd476; BiffWondercat; Bilbo Baggins; billl; ..
12
posted on
10/28/2003 11:14:54 AM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: r9etb
Aurel Stein came across these Caucasian mummies in China in the early 1900's, not much was made of it at the time.
13
posted on
10/28/2003 11:21:11 AM PST
by
blam
To: 4ConservativeJustices
"Blam, I am always amazed by your posts! Could they be part of the 10 Lost Tribes?" Thanks. I don't think these are members of the Lost Tribes. These folks out in the Tarim Basin date to 4,000BC. I think the 'tribes' went missing around 722BC, right?
14
posted on
10/28/2003 11:23:39 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Well, yeah, I've read all those things.
The northwestern Chinese have a lot of Caucasion attributes. The Picts, I think, were probably the [original?] inhabitants of the isles [Phoenicean/Iberian?) who were displaced or absorbed by later Scythians. I think it likely that the Chinese Kelts were Scyths. This is my un-schooled surmise, mostly based upon visible physical generalities, art traditions, language, and a bit of reading on the subject....becoming foggy now.
As far as going back to 5600bc.....idunno. Facinatin' stuff!
Enjoyed your post on Picts, as well. Got a ping-list?
15
posted on
10/28/2003 11:29:04 AM PST
by
dasboot
(Celebrate UNITY!)
To: blam; 4ConservativeJustices
archaeologists estimate that nomadic tribes in north China had contacts with Western civilizations approximately 2,500 years ago.Refering to what you posted this would place this contact around the time of Northern Israel being dispursed?
The other mummies however makes one wonder?
16
posted on
10/28/2003 11:34:26 AM PST
by
Ff--150
(we have been fed with milk, not meat)
To: dasboot; farmfriend
17
posted on
10/28/2003 11:40:11 AM PST
by
blam
To: Ff--150
"Refering to what you posted this would place this contact around the time of Northern Israel being dispursed?" The most recent artifacts found were dated to 2600 years ago. The Western people in the region go back as early as 4,000BC.
If you remember FReeper "LostTribe", he thought that the Celts were the lost tribes. BTW, FReeper "LostTribe" was banned.
18
posted on
10/28/2003 11:51:18 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
please add me to this ping list - thanks
To: blam
The most recent artifacts found were dated to 2600 years ago. The Western people in the region go back as early as 4,000BC. I think we are in agreement here about the northern mummies around the time of the Ten Tribes being scattered, not that they are or are not. The western mummies are interesting.
20
posted on
10/28/2003 12:02:57 PM PST
by
Ff--150
(we have been fed with milk, not meat)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson