Posted on 10/23/2003 5:58:54 PM PDT by First_Salute
Radiologist's report; "Exhibit 'A'" of that lawsuit:
BONE SCAN
Indication: Evaluate for traumaProcedure and findings: Multple gamma camera images of the
axial and proximal appendicular skeleton in the anterior and
posterior projections were obtained, following 21.1
millicuries of Technetium 99m HDP. There are extensive
number of focal abnormal areas of nuclide accumulation of
intense type. These include multiple bilateral ribs, the
costovertebral aspects of several of the thoracic vertebral
bodies, the L1 vertebral body, both sacroiliac joints, the
distal right femoral diaphysis, both knees, and both ankles,
right greater than left. Correlative radiographs are
obtained of the lumbar spine and of the right femur which
reveal compression fracture, minor, superior end plate of L1
and shaggy irregular periosteal ossification along the
distal femoral diaphysis and metaphysis primarily
ventrally. The patient has a history of trauma, most
likely the femoral periosteal reaction reflects a response
to a subperiosteal hemorrage and the activity in L1
correlates perfectly with the compression fracture which is
presumably traumatic. The presumption is that the other
multiple areas of abnormal activity also relate to previous
trauma. Additional possibility would be neoplastic bone
disease, widespread disseminated infectious bone disease or
multiple bone infarcts from abnormal hemoglobin.CONCLUSION
Multiple areas of abnormal scintigraphic accumulation some
of which are radiographic for differential as discussed
above.W. Campbell Walker. M.D./mjt
Dictated 3/5/91
Transcribed 3/5/91
Not "a Copy ..."
This is a case of a husband seeking release to die for his wife, who is in a persistant vegetative state. The feature of all is history is a husband or wife's responsibility to give permission for their opposite to be allowed to die when the medical opinion is that spouse will be forever in a braindead state.
Yes, there are suspicious circumstances. Yes, the husband stands to gain from her death. But, the fact is that no one here knows what Terri's wishes are. No one here took vows of marriage to her. Only her husband.
If he does this with evil and gain in his heart, that is GOD'S business. The public has no business in it.
I understand the problem and the fear of many. Should this become a precedent, then we, ourselves, may be in a similar situation where we are conscious and unable to communicate and do not want to die. We can put ourselves, in our ignorance, in Terri's place, and feel the fear of death we don't wish.
But how many have been screaming inside to die, unable to screan outwardly, and been denied that by machine and medicine? Distinguishing from the senario in the last paragraph, what may happen when we may be in a vegetative hell, screaming to get out and the public won't let us die.
It cuts both ways.
With respect to the passage in Revelation, in this century only has technology reached the point where a person, who would have been dead in previous years, can be kept alive artificially. I think the evidence, in this age, that this passage applies is greater than the evidence it doesn't.
One day, I suggested to her that if she stopped praying, it might happen.
Within the year or so, when I was again visiting the area, I learned that she was in a local hospital and dying, so they thought. I rushed in there to see her.
She was a little thin, but still feisty; gosh, there was so much life in her.
She had many comments to make about the care she was, and was not, receiving. (Yep, I thought, that's Sunny.)
I asked her, What are you doing here? Go home and be where you can see the lake and life. Don't die here; there's nothing that they can do for you here, that you cannot arrange at home.
She actually, promptly went home, and she was gone within the week.
That night, I had a dream of visiting her lakefront home, and in the garden to the west of the house, there stood a deer. She was looking at the lake, and then she looked at me with large pretty eyes.
I like to think that she found her peace.
Lots of folks brought up the Clinton era, and this will be where I draw my rationale. By Michael verbalizing his wishes for Terri's death so as to get rich, he was covering up his true motive: fear of her recovering well enough to talk and tell about the abuse he gave her then and now.
Use a bad thing to cover up a worse thing. It worked then and is working now.
I seem to remember one of the Communists (might have been Lenin) to have observed, "If you want to hide a knife, put a fork and spoon beside it."
Aside from the injustice done to Terri, it is a wrong done to all the nursing staff who have to adhere to these inhumane orders.
I hope that hospice goes out of business.
But I'm not holding my breath because Big Money is behind the Right to Die movement (i.e. many politicians and judges are bought and paid for--and the ones that aren't know not to buck the "system").
Don't think so based on further descriptions of 'those days' found in Revelation.
You'd have to presume that he understood the notes even if he saw them. Nurse's notes are often rather cryptic unless one understands the 'language.'
Can you find Michael Schiavo's nursing license mentioned in the state's records, too?
Aw, you shouldn't have. (Thanked me, that is.) (Literally)
The passage in Revelation that you picked up has nothing to say about modern technology. The prayers for death spoken of are a response to the fifth trumpet judgement, the plague of demonic locusts. Context, context. You might as well have quoted "The Sound of Music".
This is a case of a husband seeking release to die for his wife, who is in a persistant vegetative state. The feature of all is history is a husband or wife's responsibility to give permission for their opposite to be allowed to die when the medical opinion is that spouse will be forever in a braindead state.
What is "medical opinion"? What makes this so sacred? "Medical opinion" in real life is an ink mark on a dead tree. As long as that mark has the right marks after it, to blazes with the facts. We can always get a mark when we want it. Look at the abortion industry. All those killings are done because they are "medically necessary" for the "life and health" of the mother. The phrase "and health" has been mutated into a weasel exception that allows abortion in any circumstance. And so here, with PVS. Don't think that this term can't be expanded to allow the killing of anyone at all--if it can be applied to TS the way it has, there are no guarantees for anybody.
I want to say, "you should actually learn the facts before posting to these threads", or actually, SHOUT IT! but now I feel like I'm feeding a troll. So, have a nice day. While you still can.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.