Skip to comments.
"China space shot a warning for West" (Brit historian sees dawn of Chinese Century)
London Sunday Telegraph ^
| Oct. 19, 03
| Andrew Roberts
Posted on 10/19/2003 11:21:18 AM PDT by churchillbuff
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: Eric Paul
Thanks for the evaluation of the mood of the people. When I was teaching English to Chinese grad students a few years ago, that is the impression I got also. The only one who wanted to stay in America needed a sponsor, which he was having trouble finding.
41
posted on
10/20/2003 10:23:27 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Eric Paul
I was there 7 years ago. I heard this from tour guides, the elite of Chinese society. They know they are not free and have no respect for the gov't.
42
posted on
10/20/2003 1:13:02 PM PDT
by
appeal2
To: RightWhale
"China's problem will be industrial power. Oil and natural gas mainly"
Japan had that same problem in the 1930's.
To: RightWhale
"China's problem will be industrial power. Oil and natural gas mainly"
Japan had that same problem in the 1930's.
To: chilepepper
If you look at insurance company auto theft reports, you would see that auto is down by more than half. Are the auto carriers lying to protect the NYPD. Are they lying on their financial statements and underplaying how much they are paying out in claims.
Yes I do take the subways. They are nowhere near as fearful as they used to be. I go to court in the Bronx on the formerly "Grand" Concourse. Back in the early 90's when your hero Dinkins was running things the Court Officers were afraid to eat lunch there. Now go there during lunchtime and see the field of blue and whites.
Go to Washington Square Park or Tomkins Square Park. No junkies and drug dealers to be found. You can actually bring your kids.
Harlem and the Bronx, sure there are still rough areas, but the South Bronx is being regenerated.
Look at Times Square. You can walk around there 24/7 and not be in fear for your life. Before RG it was worth your life. I know, my office was there for 25 years. So don't tell me.
You are just a lurker here. It is quite obvious.
45
posted on
10/20/2003 1:18:36 PM PDT
by
appeal2
To: Siamese Princess
"Not necessarily, they might invade Taiwan. The prospect of acquiring a wife is a good incentive for a man."\
Booty and plunder have been age old incentives to make armies wage war.
To: churchillbuff
They're not ready for a real lunar base. Twenty years, minimum, and that is contingent on a lunar base showing value.
To: Bonaparte
"It's a recipe for disaster."
Yes indeed. As America bleeds its intellect it opens up greater opportunity for Chicom sleepers to become integrated within our domestic science programs that now require foreign skills and intellect.
The end reslult is that National Security has a great risk of being comprised by our lack of internal control.
To: churchillbuff
Sure, theyre in orbit now, and its an impressive accomplishment for which they deserve congratulations but our guys were
playing golf on the moon when Chinas first astronaut was still running around the playground in his crotchless pajamas.
Im not worried about the Chinese military/government space program, because we Americans are going into the space business, and business always moves faster than do government programs. By the time the government in Peking gets around to setting up the first lunar ping-pong tournament, well have a privately-owned space railroad up and running, carrying freight and passengers into space for the price of a first-class ticket to Europe. The space railway will play the same role in the opening of the moon, Mars, asteroids, and planets that the transcontinental railroads played in the colonization of the American West. Once that space railway is built, the solar system will be ours.
49
posted on
10/20/2003 1:27:33 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: theFIRMbss
Please, sir. Spare us the conspiracy theory.
The surface of the moon is made of granulated rock a layer of loose regolith on top of a layer of steel-hard rock and compressed powder. The Lunar Modules tiny engine (9,900 lbs thrust) was powerful enough to blow the top layer of powder away, but nowhere near hot or energetic enough to gouge out a crater in the compacted regolith beneath it. Asking wheres the crater? underneath the Lunar Module makes as much sense as asking why a jet airliners engines (roughly 18,500-23,500 lbs thrust x 2 engines for a B727) dont blow a hole in a concrete runway every time one takes off. The answer is that neither vehicles engines produces anywhere near enough thrust to blast out a crater in a hard surface.
50
posted on
10/20/2003 1:48:56 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: theFIRMbss; All
There is a typo in my previous post. The phrase roughly 18,500-23,500 lbs thrust x 2 engines for a B727 should read roughly 18,500-23,500 lbs thrust x 2 engines for a B737. (A B727 has three engines, not two as does the B737.) Sorry for the mistake.
51
posted on
10/20/2003 1:52:33 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: B-Chan
>Please, sir ... The Lunar Modules tiny engine (9,900 lbs thrust) was powerful enough to blow the top layer of powder away, but nowhere near hot or energetic enough to gouge out a crater
Without tin foil, why
would the internet exist?
(The crater "question"
still applies. Some pics
show moon dust at the landing,
footsteps by the LEM,
that kind of thing. So,
it wasn't blown away by
engines at landing.
Then why don't we see
a specific depression
in whatever's there?)
To: theFIRMbss
The crater "question" still applies. Some pics show moon dust at the landing, footsteps by the LEM, that kind of thing. So, it wasn't blown away by engines at landing. Then why don't we see a specific depression in whatever's there? The dust beneath the LM was blown away by the engines jet exhaust, leaving bare rock and tightly-compacted regolith there. (As I explained previously, no crater was formed in the rock and regolith beneath the LM because the LM engine wasnt stron enough to blast a crater into it.)
As for the footprints: the dust surrounding the LM wasnt directly under the engine and therefore did not get blown away. Remember, the Moon has no atmosphere to speak of; only the dust that was directly beneath the LM's exhaust plume would be affected by it. Other dust (even if it were only a few feet away) would be undisturbed by the engine blast because there is no wind to carry the force of the engines exhaust.
53
posted on
10/20/2003 3:13:24 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: churchillbuff
Let us get Government out of Business and personal lives and put it back in the box it belongs in, and we would Bury the Chinese.
Our government is our own worst enemy, not the Chinese.
54
posted on
10/20/2003 3:22:04 PM PDT
by
Leatherneck_MT
(If you continue to do what you've always done, you will continue to get what you've always got)
To: B-Chan
>only the dust that was
directly beneath the LM's exhaust plume would be affected by it. Other dust (even if it were only a
few feet away) would be undisturbed by the engine blast
As denials go,
that's "plausible." [!] But the moon
has a kind of thing
called a "rayed crater."
The idea is, impacts
and disturbances
spread material
visibly and great distance
in low gravity.
NASA doesn't show
any crater or debris
blown from the landing.
To: appeal2
Seven years ago this was true but no longer. Tour guides are still a respected position but no longer the elite of society. The elite consist of upper party members as usual and now businessmen. No longer do most of them wish to leave. The party members of course do not wish to go. The businessmen see where the action is and also wish to stay. I think it is interesting to note that businessmen were officially granted membership in the proletariat about four years ago. The new course for the party seems to be very inclusive; they want all the money makers in their corner. I went on a tour a couple of weeks ago and that tour guide did not wish to leave the country. Instead she went on and on about how much better things had been getting over the past few years.
56
posted on
10/20/2003 9:43:06 PM PDT
by
Eric Paul
(Geography is Important)
To: Eric Paul
>The elite consist of upper
party members as usual and now
businessmen During the Third Reich,
there was a lot of conflict
between businessmen
and party members.
Speer says the early "success"
of the Nazis was
because businessmen
were empowered to work free,
but that same success
also empowered
the NAZI party, which then
began usurping
and undercutting
rational business controls.
When "party thinking"
dominated all,
the Reich started to crumble,
and then fell apart.
This same dynamic --
business success followed by
political crash --
may play itself out
in China -- their successes
may lead to their crash...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson