Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strykers readying for first deployment
ARNEWS Army News Service ^ | Oct. 15, 2003 | Specialist Bill Putnam

Posted on 10/16/2003 8:17:21 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
OO-rah!

Semper Fi

Carry on.

1 posted on 10/16/2003 8:17:22 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Army works to be more capable, competent, lethal

Schoomaker said he wished that the Army's new Stryker Brigade had been ready for the Iraq war. He would love to have seen it flown in to join the 173rd Airborne Brigade when it jumped into northern Iraq. ''Stryker comes with more infantry in it than any other formation - 1,160 per brigade. the Stryker's speed and agility gives us the best operating radius and abilities we have ever had.''

The Army is sending one brigade of Strykers to Iraq this month, and intends to organize five more, including one for the Army National Guard. ''By the time we get to five or six,'' Schoomaker said, ''we may want to go for even more.''

He said that if the Stryker is used properly, he wasn't worried that the lightly armored, wheeled vehicle would be too vulnerable to hostile fire. ''It doesn't matter what you wrap yourself in; someone is always going to build a bigger bullet,'' he said.

2 posted on 10/16/2003 8:21:05 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Better to die on your feet than live on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; ALOHA RONNIE; American in Israel; American Soldier; archy; armymarinemom; blackbag; ...
PING!

Stryker Brigade Combat Team Tactical Studies Group (Chairborne)

3 posted on 10/16/2003 8:25:47 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Better to die on your feet than live on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Army seeks public comment on Stryker impact survey

The approximately 300 eight-wheeled armored vehicles that make up a Stryker Brigade Combat Team wouldn't start arriving until early 2006

If the brigade is approved, the military would need an additional 23,000 acres on the Big Island, 1,400 acres on O'ahu, and land for 49 miles of private trails to keep the 20-ton Strykers off public roads as much as possible during training.

The vehicles would be based at Schofield and travel by private trail to Dillingham Airfield and Kahuku Training Area for training. Strykers also would be transported by C-17 cargo jets, and use Pohakuloa Training Area on the Big Island.

4 posted on 10/16/2003 8:33:00 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Better to die on your feet than live on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Is testing going on at WSMR and Yuma as well?
5 posted on 10/16/2003 8:44:32 AM PDT by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
The Stryker is a boondogle!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I work for the U S Army & can tell you that it can't fit into a C-130 transport plane with out stripping off everything on the outside. It takes two to three hours to take them off & then annother 2-3 hours to put everything back on.

The Stryker was to be C-130 transportable (2 per AC) but no one checked the width of the vehicles( they were 3" wider than the specs called for.) and they went over the weight limit for they vehicles as well. That is why they are being sent over to Iraq by ship!

The Army wasted & continnues to waste $$$$$ on the Stryker program when the U S Marine LAV's was already a proven Vehicle System that the Army could have picked up at a discount(since there was no R&D to pay for) and been ready to deploy in half the time it has taken the Stryker to be deployed.

The Army would not choose the Marine LAV's simply because they were developed by the Marines.

As I said the Stryker program is a BOONDOGGLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
6 posted on 10/16/2003 8:46:44 AM PDT by Southron Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
So lemme see here. We got the venetian-blind RPG catcher shell, inside of that, we got the ceramic HMG-stoppers, proof against the 14.5mm COMBLOC round, but not the 23mm COMBLOC, which is kind of hard to hide, but was produced in the millions. Then finally, we get down to the actual Stryker

So the first two RPG rounds blow away all this crap, then what happens? Please God, the boys will dismount about a mile from town and go in in some appropriate patrol formation, with artillery back-up, and on-call air. THis is a big taxi-cab ... no kind of fighting vehicle.

You could not drive this thing down an American alley.It will be immobile and helpless in the rabbit warren towns and villages of the rest of the world.

7 posted on 10/16/2003 8:49:07 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
Military Newspaper Finds Low Troop Morale Results Raise New Worries About Deployments

The survey by the military newspaper Stars and Stripes says one-third of U.S. troops surveyed in Iraq say their morale is low. And half say they're not likely to stay in the armed forces.

8 posted on 10/16/2003 8:58:33 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Better to die on your feet than live on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
They will dismount outside of town.

The Canadians are running their 8-wheeled armored cars in Kabul with fair success. You reckon Afghan towns are easier to get around in than Iraqi towns?

9 posted on 10/16/2003 9:09:47 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Better to die on your feet than live on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
Sure we should listen to experts like you and ignore the actual fighting men's opinions.
10 posted on 10/16/2003 9:17:01 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: inPhase
moo-la, oddishee
11 posted on 10/16/2003 9:24:11 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Better to die on your feet than live on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Wouldn't it be a helluva lot cheaper to transport them by freighter? Jeez, airmailing them to Oahu for training seems a bit extreme. It's not like they are being rushed to a combat zone. How many C-17's does it take to airlift 300 Strykers to Hawaii anyway?
12 posted on 10/16/2003 9:35:39 AM PDT by CO_dreamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CO_dreamer
yes

They will be stationed on Oahu and shipped or flown to the Big Island for training.

150

13 posted on 10/16/2003 9:40:16 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Better to die on your feet than live on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
We got the venetian-blind RPG catcher shell, inside of that, we got the ceramic HMG-stoppers, proof against the 14.5mm COMBLOC round, but not the 23mm COMBLOC, which is kind of hard to hide.

My understanding is that the ceramic armor not only failed livefire testing with 14.5mm ammunition, but also was penetrated by hits from the 12,7x108mm DShK heavy machinegun sometimes referred to as a *.51 caliber* and slightly more powerful than the US .50x99mm M2 Browning MG with which the Stryker is armed.

The 12,7mm Dash-ka is not exactly *concealable* under a jacket, no mor than a .50 M2. But it's easier to move than a 14.5mm KPV or PTRD rifle, and should be quite capable of chewing the tires right off one side of a Stryker, and when used from above, as from atop a city roof or the sides of a mountain pass [as when the Afghan Mujahadin ambushed Soviet BTR wheelies in Afghanistan and cut through their roof armor from above] should cut through the Stryker's half-inch steel top plating like hot marbles through butter. And the KSVK semiauto 12,7 Russian rifle equivalent of the M82A1 Barrett Light Fifty should do the same.

-archy-/-


14 posted on 10/16/2003 10:34:35 AM PDT by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4; archy; SLB
A little birdy dropped in today and told me the MGS is not doing so well in the "unofficial" test being conducted at Ft Knox.

SLB - Since you reside there, can you shed some light on this for the rest of us?
15 posted on 10/16/2003 10:37:03 AM PDT by 30-06 Springfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CO_dreamer
How many C-17's does it take to airlift 300 Strykers to Hawaii anyway?

2 Strykers per C-17 sortie load, plus seperate transport for crews, spare parts, [LOTS of extra wheels and tires; I understand they're deploying with 150% spare tires, 12 spares per vehicle] maintenance crews and other useful accessories, assuming fuel and ammo in place where they arrive. Accordingly, a ballpark answer would be 300 flights.

The Air Force originally programmed to buy a total of 120 C-17s, with the last one being delivered in November 2004. The fiscal 2000 budget funded another 14 C-17s for special operations duty.
-US Air Force C-17 FactFile.

-archy-/-

16 posted on 10/16/2003 10:44:23 AM PDT by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 30-06 Springfield
A little birdy dropped in today and told me the MGS is not doing so well in the "unofficial" test being conducted at Ft Knox.

If I was a little birdy wanting to see something interesting, I might fly over the Steeles tank gunnery range and Wilcox Multi-Purpose Digital Training Ranges....

Or as the little birdy said: Hey, wasn't that a MGS I just spotted...?

17 posted on 10/16/2003 10:49:39 AM PDT by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: archy
2 Strykers per C-17

If that's all a C-17 can carry, I don't see the point of the Stryker. You can pack 10 time the HUMVEE mounted fire-power in that bird for a fraction of the cost. Or even one Bradley or M1.

18 posted on 10/16/2003 11:43:04 AM PDT by PsyOp ( Citizenship ought to be reserved for those who carry arms. - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
2 Strykers per C-17

If that's all a C-17 can carry, I don't see the point of the Stryker. You can pack 10 time the HUMVEE mounted fire-power in that bird for a fraction of the cost. Or even one Bradley or M1.

The reason given for the cancellation of the Crusader self-propelled 155mm artillery piece [and more importantly, its equally high-performance ammunition support vehicle] was that only two could be carried aboard a C-17.

And so, given a choice between a full-tracked 155mm SP gun also mounting an M2 .50 Browning heavy MG, with the main gun having a range of 30+ miles, commanders can instead have their choice of an eight-wheeled armored car of similar size and bulk, which mounts only the .50 MG usable out to 1200 meters, or they can walk.

The usual loadout for the M113A3 personnel carrier in a C17 is five of the fully-loaded, 11-ton vehicles, which can also be airdropped from a C17- the Stryker can't. There's also a 1-meter longer stretched version of the M113 known as the MTVL, which can carry a squad of 11 over the Standard M113 or Stryker's 9-man squad, should a medic, combat engineer/EOD minesweeper, K9 operator or POWs need to be transported with the squad. The MTVL is also adaptablte to a somewhat wider range of armament than the parent vehicle, to include the now-experimental 8-shot ground launch Hellfire AT guided missile with a near 10KM tankkilling range.

And of course a mix of armored HUMVEEs and M113A3s in a C17 is very possible, and has been done dozens of times, probably hundreds- if not thousands. The M113A3 and MTVL are amphibious and can swim a river or lake; the HUMVEE of course, is not.

-archy-/-


19 posted on 10/16/2003 12:26:10 PM PDT by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: archy
Not 2 Crusaders on a C-17/C-5, but the 2 peices of the Crusader System minus any AMMO. The ammo & Crew had to be shipped on a seperate C-17/C-5.
20 posted on 10/16/2003 2:14:02 PM PDT by Southron Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson