Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wow: Two new polls show massive majorities favor new infrastructure spending
Hot Air ^ | March 8, 2017 | Allahpundit

Posted on 03/09/2017 12:57:56 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: BRL
Whatever it takes to get him reelected. I am so done with the idea of trying to get the deficit under control. It’s a Fool’s errand

It's all fun and games until the borrowers realize they won't be made whole and start dumping their bonds.

21 posted on 03/09/2017 2:14:11 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Life was so much better before Hart-Cellar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BRL

Excuse me, I meant lenders, not borrowers. We’re the borrower.


22 posted on 03/09/2017 2:14:41 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Life was so much better before Hart-Cellar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It wasn’t just $800 billion. That amount was built in to the continuing resolutions every year since.


23 posted on 03/09/2017 2:22:36 PM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BobL

I support a $1 Trillion target with no more than $200 Billion coming from the government directly. That money can then be used to leverage state, local and private funding toward infrastructure priorities. Roads, bridges, sewers, water, electricity &, network infrastructure.

Projects should be priority based and not just block funded to states based on population. No reason California gets funding based on its population rather than Wyoming for roads, bridges etc. Very clear guidelines on how money can be spent. No funding for new Transportation administrative headquarters built with infrastructure spending for instance. No redirecting by state to boondoggles like bullet trains and massive solar and wind projects.


24 posted on 03/09/2017 2:29:08 PM PST by georgiarat (The To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: georgiarat; MinuteGal

For Obama, his alleged “infrastructure bill” was just a gigantic slush fund for his friends, where very little infrastructure repair/buildup was actually done.

Pubs know that Trump, in particular in light of his extensive building trade lifetime of experience, will actually accomplish what he sets out to do, for the betterment of the American people. What better person than Trump to be heading up an infrastructure prioritized program that will REALLY get what needs to be done, done.

Only catch is every finished project will be named Trump, lol. Trump bridge, Trump sewer system, Trump canal, etc. etc. Fine by me.


25 posted on 03/09/2017 2:48:49 PM PST by flaglady47 (TRUMP 45. How sweet it is. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

NO!


26 posted on 03/09/2017 2:51:53 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I fully believe President Trump can cut a trillion dollars out of the budget over four years, so a trillion dollar infrastructure bill, if they are good productive investments, would be easy to afford without getting into more debt. If we grow the economy at 4% four eight years without substantially getting into more debt, we can pay it off with much less pain.


27 posted on 03/09/2017 3:41:26 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BRL

Currently, we spend almost half a trillion dollars each and every year on interest on the national debt (about 487B last I heard, could be off a few billion here and there!). That expenditure doesn’t touch the principal.

Personally, I am not in the camp that thinks we can’t do better...

That said, yes we need to improve/maintain our nation’s essential infrastructure. But let’s do it in a way that doesn’t increase the national debt. That’s Obama’s and the Democrats’ way. There are more responsible ways to do it in my opinion.


28 posted on 03/09/2017 3:51:14 PM PST by Let_It_Be_So (Once you see the Truth, you cannot "unsee" it, no matter how hard you may try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You can’t borrow from “the future,” or from “our children and grandchildren,” no matter what sloppy thinkers think.

As Hayek and Mises said, WWII was fully paid for the instant the last bullet was fired. In other words, all government spending makes somebody poorer, whether it’s for war, bridges, schrools, anything. And it makes people poorer NOW, not ten, fifty, or a hundred years from now.


29 posted on 03/09/2017 3:57:10 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (https://youtu.be/IYUYya6bPGw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson