[CainConservative]

Newt!!

[CainConservative]

Newt!!

[EternalVigilance]

None of the above. Not even for dogcatcher, much less the presidency of the United States.

[jersey117]

Perry

[Lakeshark]

1. Palin
2. Cain
4. Perry
5. Santorum (I wish he could be 3)
6. Bachmann
A very distant:
7. Huntsman
Can't get behind him evah
8. Mittens.

And, for now.....
3. Newt. Because I trust the others less......

[goseminoles]

Cain in the primaries.

[McGavin999]

Perry, he walks the walk.

[NavyCanDo]

I'll wait and see who the VP choice is. Just look at McCain on 2008. We disliked him as much or even more than we dislike Romney today. Yet one brilliant VP pick (Palin) and you could not contain the excitement here on FR. It even had many of us McCain bashers reach for our check books to send the McCain campaign a little something, or ask how we might volunteer. It was one of the smartest picks of a VP in presidential history.

[winkadink]

Rick Perry

[Rashputin]

Why is Romney, who is clearly and emphatically is against everything FR clearly says it stands for, even on the list? Seriously, anyone who frequents FR and has therefore seen all the information posted here about Snitt definitely values something else far more than they value the Constitution and even the right to life. Snitt father of RomneyCare which was the prototype for Obamacare, anyone who would vote for the father of Romney care doesn't care about this country. Continuing to pump and babble about a carbon copy of Barry Soetoro is absurd and that's all Snitt is, a carbon copy of what we are trying to get rid of.

Since the democrat fascists lynched Cain the way they've always lynched runaway slaves who flee democrat plantations, I have to go with Newt. Even if Cain had stayed in the running, I would have liked to have seen him pick Newt as VP, so it could be worse.

JMHO

[edzo4]

I will vote for which ever one gets the nomination, I hate the all or nothing mentality of some here. if they don’t get exactly what they want they will sit it out, that is the exact reason the country is where it is today because the left never says all or nothing they take every inch they can every time they can and over the last 40 50 years we have been creeping and creeping towards where we are today, I will vote for any one of them because we cannot take another four years of obama period

[harpu]

ANY, and every, (R) beats Øbozo with any reasonable effort by our conservative majority.

[goodnesswins]

The one with the “b*lls” to take on Obomba and his backers...

[sonic109]

Newt, with some uncertainty as well . Is somebody going to tally this up?

[Pit1]

Don’t like it, but bozo will probably win another 4 years. We need to concentrate on the SENATE. That way numnutz can’t get most lib crap through.

[mbynack]

Michele Bachmann.

[isthisnickcool]

Jim Robinson

[HereInTheHeartland]

Eisenhower. I like Ike......

[Charles Henrickson]

The only one I could not possibly vote for is Ron-Paul Ahmanutjob.

Huntsman does nothing for me. No connection there at all.

All the rest--Romney, Perry, Gingrich, Santorum, and Bachmann--have their good points and their bad points. I am looking for the best combination of conservatism, competence, and electability. Each of the five candidates is strong in one or two of those areas but weak in one or two also. Any of them would be far preferable to Obama.

The Missouri primary is February 7, so there may be some thinning of the herd by then. Also, this time, the Missouri delegates will be chosen by caucus, and our primary is just a popularity contest.

[Little Ray]

AGAINST Obama.

Beyond that I’ll see whose available when the Primary reaches my state.