This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?
The Cato Institute ^
| August 3, 2002
| By Veronique de Rugy
Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 921-932 next last
To: Spirited
His largest drawback was having Bushpappa insinuated on him. What with a gun pointed at his head?
To: Jesse
Cut taxes...for real, then and there.He did cut taxes, then raised them in 1983, and raised the SS tax in 1984. He also, along with Dan Rostenkowski, sent real estate into a funk in 1986 by eliminating selected tax breaks for rental real estate owners.
Reagan was the greatest president of the 20th century, but he got snookered by the Democrats on tax policy and did less to advance the pro-life agenda in 8 years than Bush has done in 2.
62
posted on
08/04/2002 9:35:23 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
Ok, I'll concede. I will give Ron a 6.5, and lower Bush Jr. to a 3. Bush Sr. get a 2.
63
posted on
08/04/2002 9:38:58 PM PDT
by
Jesse
To: Twodees
This site could lose the entire clique of Bushbots and survive. Losing all the old timers who carried the fight to the democrats while most of the W swoonfest posters here were voting democrat will kill this forum. Keep it up and there won't be an FR anymore. Yeah all of the Lew Rockwell, John Birch Society, Harry Browne, Alan Keyes , Larry Klayman Cliques will really keep the forum afloat. LMAO
To: Texasforever
You need to rest your keyboard, boy. It ain't as if you've ever had anything to say anyway. Sober up.
65
posted on
08/04/2002 9:39:30 PM PDT
by
Twodees
To: Twodees
Losing all the old timers who carried the fight to the democrats while most of the W swoonfest posters here were voting democrat will kill this forum. Keep it up and there won't be an FR anymore. Change your Depends, will ya?
Most of us "oldtimers" voted for Bush and carried the fight to the democrats.
FR has survived purges, stampedes-out-the-door and bannings.
You Bush-bashers are all over the forum, yet you whine when one of yours steps over the line and gets canned.
FR will be just fine, pops. Even if you stay.
66
posted on
08/04/2002 9:40:09 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: Twodees
dd...you said banned.....
NOTE:......"and get him banned the way you did" ...
Doesn't say suspended.... but the truth, not to worry
This web site has survived flare ups and departures before and will in the future...... I doubt any one group will take it down.... as long as funding survives.
67
posted on
08/04/2002 9:40:17 PM PDT
by
deport
To: Texasforever; Howlin; deport; rintense
So...I see all the usual suspects are here.
my guess is that twodees is about 4'10" and therein lies the majority of his problem
To: Twodees
You need to rest your keyboard, boy. It ain't as if you've ever had anything to say anyway. Sober up. Ah now ya went and hurt my feelings.
To: Uncle Bill
Bush is a liberal. This is what happens when you try to please everybody.
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
I'm with you Lucius! President Bush is a mixed bag. What are we suppose to do, throw our support behind someone who has no chance to win? I can't stand the atmosphere in this country when a Democrat is in control- the homosexual lobby, the environmentalist, NOW, Jesse Jackson etc. all have more power and exposure. It makes me sick to my stomach the thought of having to go through that again.
71
posted on
08/04/2002 9:41:33 PM PDT
by
sjeann
To: Uncle Bill
Bump for later reading.
72
posted on
08/04/2002 9:41:52 PM PDT
by
justshe
To: Texasforever
Yeah all of the Lew Rockwell, John Birch Society, Harry Browne, Alan Keyes , Larry Klayman Cliques will really keep the forum afloat. LMAO And just look at what huge successes their respective web sites are!
73
posted on
08/04/2002 9:41:54 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Twodees
BTW, you aren't including yourself in the "oldtimers," are you?
You've been here all of 17 months.
74
posted on
08/04/2002 9:42:15 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: Twodees
I suggest before you start hurling accusations that you realize that Registered was suspended for posting another member's personal information on the forum.
If you wish to defend that, Mr. Privacy Rights, go right ahead.
To: Twodees; deport; sinkspur; Howlin
Suspended and the man says it may as well be a permanent ban because he isn't coming back.Since he last posted 10 days ago, and is a freeper in good standing now, that sounds like a one week suspension. Having been banned for a shorter time myself, I know it is annoying, but if 'he isn't coming back', that is his decision, not JimRob's or anything that Howlin did.
To: Miss Marple
Don't bother him with the truth, it makes his head hurt.
To: ChadGore; Texasforever
To: Roscoe
And just look at what huge successes their respective web sites are! COBweb sites.
To: doryfunk
We need some State legislatures to take charge and appoint electors to the electoral college with no pretense of an election of the masses, the way our system was desinged. Unfortunately most state legislators fall into two categories, they are as corrupt as those in Washington, or as clueless as the voters that elected them.
80
posted on
08/04/2002 9:46:11 PM PDT
by
c-b 1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 921-932 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson