HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?

The Cato Institute ^ | August 3, 2002 | By Veronique de Rugy

[Mo1]

Not to drag this out any further, suffice it to say that I doubt the word of you folks.

Oh Good Grief ... excuse me while I go bang my head on the desk also

You are truly unbelievable

[HalfIrish]

Staking yourself to W is a losing proposition. If you are convinced that W's administration wants to look at Posse Comitatus to seal our borders, you have deluded yourself and can't be reached. He hasn't done a GD thing to change the worst aspects of the INS. Defending his inaction and actions re immigration is defending traitorous conduct.

[Sandy]

Some people may think it's a good excuse. I don't.

[nopardons]

You " doubt " the words of those , whom you continually smear, because you don't want to believe anything they post; fact or not / truth or lie/. That's juvenile and unsupportable, on your part. It is the same thing that a two year old would do, when he / she is arguing with a parent.

If any of them pots, the sky is blue, are you then , out of pique, going to say : " Nope, becausze YOU say so, that can't be true ! " ?

BTW, calling people " drunks ", for no reason, is considered to be a personal attack . Personal attacks are against posting rules. You continually break most of these rules, everytime you reply. Kindly observe the rules; they're here for a reason !

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

They remember what soemone said about it and later swear that they witnessed what someone told them when they only heard or read it. That happens and it looks an awful lot like that's what's happening here.

You weren't there. We were. No one believes you, and anyone can see that you simply can't concede an argument no matter how many credible people pull you to the curb. You haven't a leg to stand on.

And where is Registered to help you out, and deny all this?

Go to bed.

[Twodees]

Oh my gosh, GIVE UP. IT WAS BAD. PERIOD.

Yes, it would be bad if that's what he did. I'm getting this long, drawn out and hopelessly convoluted explanation and input from several people saying the same thing as though it was scripted for them. Sorry, but it still looks like a bait and snitch. It must not have been too bad, because it was a suspension instead of a banning. Y'all are describing a crime here; cyberstalking.

No sale.

[Brush_Your_Teeth]

At least he won't bail out some 3rd world South American country so the big banks don't lose money.

Wrong. Bush bailed out Uruguay to the tune of 1.5 billion.

[Texasforever]

He hasn't done a GD thing to change the worst aspects of the INS. Defending his inaction and actions re immigration is defending traitorous conduct.

You may need to look up traitorous before you so casually put the charge out there. Treason is a capital crime. Should Bush be tried and executed?

[nopardons]

You haven't a clue , about what goes on here with suspentions and bannings.

You weren't on the thread, where the info link was posted. All you're doing, as usual, is talking about something you know absolutely NOTHING about.

[Texasforever]

Psst. Brush your teeth.

[Twodees]

You're arguing here about what he posted. Isn't the issue that it was posted at all? If not, it should be.

What was posted matters because unless it was really what you say, then it wouldn't have been an actionable offense to post it. I doubt seriously that what he posted is what you claimed. Sorry, but I have no real reason to take your word for anything.

[terilyn]

Well, since I haven't seen Oprah in about 18 years I wouldn't know.

You're right, I called you a liar. You were posting a version of what happened that was untrue as fact.

Now I've posted the facts, with hard evidence, and you still claim I'm imagining things.

Go ahead and bury your head. I don't honestly care anymore. Here I thought you claimed to be a true conservative. I thought conservatives wanted their theories based on fact and evidence and truth.

I know I've made my point, proven it with facts, done the homework, and provided you the links. There are several witnesses here as to what occurred and yet you choose to believe what you want to.

I know when I'm beating a dead horse. When someone you are having a discussion with is willing not only to look at the facts as presented but has the ability to actually absorb those facts and come up with a reasonable conclusion then the effort is worthwhile. Otherwise it's a waste of time, energy, and bandwidth.

You are now free to go back to watching Oprah.

[nopardons]

I would like the name of ONE president ( just one... LOL ), who has actually completely maned all four borders, of the USA ... EVER ... and stopped the flow of those attempting to get in illegally.

[Texasforever]

Tell ya what give me a week and I can have you signing a different tune.

[Mo1]

Yes, it would be bad if that's what he did

He did do it .. not only that .. he followed her to ANOTHER thread and offered to post the information again on that thread ...

For some reason he had it out for her .. why I don't know

It was wrong .. it was not called for .. it was out of line and it was reckless and dangerous

And how you can defend this is beyond me

[Mo1]

Yes, it would be bad if that's what he did

He did do it .. not only that .. he followed her to ANOTHER thread and offered to post the information again on that thread ...

For some reason he had it out for her .. why I don't know

It was wrong .. it was not called for .. it was out of line and it was reckless and dangerous

And how you can defend this is beyond me

[Mo1]

SHOOT .. sorry for the double post

[HalfIrish]

In a true constitutional republic, W would have been reigned in long ago. Charging him with treason would not be beyond the realm of possibility. An accessory after the fact in aiding Clinton's flight from justice would be a good first charge.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Sorry, but it still looks like a bait and snitch. It must not have been too bad, because it was a suspension instead of a banning. Y'all are describing a crime here; cyberstalking.

I'll bet you blame rape victims, too. It's becoming clear that you are nothing more than an enabler, jabbering with his hands over your ears, and frankly, I am quickly approaching my disgust limit with you.

There will never be any excuse for what he did, and he deserved much worse than he got. On that, reasonable, decent, and objective people agree. Sorry to learn you will not be included in that group - but what can we expect from someone who lies coming out of the gate?

Think whatever you like. You weren't there. I was. I'm washing my hands of you.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

And how you can defend this is beyond me

It's sick. Absolutely sick.