Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Few Questions For Die-Hard Bush Supporters
Toogood Reports ^ | June 5, 2002 | Lee R. Shelton IV

Posted on 06/05/2002 1:20:54 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,301-1,302 next last
To: monday
Did somebody say Bushbot?


301 posted on 06/05/2002 5:18:13 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I can do a 360-degree slam dunk. Can you?

I can hit a golf ball 340-yards down the fairway consistently. Can you?

Show off...And yes, I can hit a golf ball 300 yards down the fairway. I'll admit that it slices off to the right quite often...[g]

302 posted on 06/05/2002 5:19:01 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
If, however, you cast your vote for Bush, still believe he is the only hope for America and intend to support every move he makes without so much as a raised eyebrow, this is for you.

With all due respect, this is a rather silly introduction.
Do you really expect people to identify themselves in such unreasonable terms, as Bush worshippers who have no standards on any issue rather than supporting Bush?
You're kidding right?

303 posted on 06/05/2002 5:20:31 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I remember the first time I tried to play golf and shanked it badly.

The guy I was playing with said that people who played like I did should swear more.

304 posted on 06/05/2002 5:20:36 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
>>Let's see some QUOTES from Bush decrying CFR.<<

I heard him do it with my own ears. You may call me a liar if you wish. For some reason, you are quick to assign evil motives to those who dare disagree with you.

But let's stop right there. Either:

1) Bush disagreed with CFR and signed it (which reinforces my point), OR
2) Bush agrees with CFR.

It's a no-win situation. Do you see that?

305 posted on 06/05/2002 5:20:52 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
This is hogwash. Souter was Warren Rudman's right hand man. That should throw off flags right away. In fact, I have heard many Democrat senators say that they voted for Souter because he was pro-abortion. Bush, Sr. nominated him thinking that Congress will cut him some slack, which it didn't. Bush, Jr is taking the same missteps.
306 posted on 06/05/2002 5:20:58 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
The author is just showing his abject lack of people skills.
307 posted on 06/05/2002 5:21:07 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: monday
I guess you missed my point, huh?
308 posted on 06/05/2002 5:21:10 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
You're the one who said he campaign against CFR, not me. I'll assume you have no proof.
309 posted on 06/05/2002 5:21:52 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
BTW-- Is your point that I am wrong and that Bush really does support CFR? Now that IS interesting.
310 posted on 06/05/2002 5:22:20 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
ref: your 159....his name is billybudd for crying out loud so don't expect to understand him...LOL
311 posted on 06/05/2002 5:22:21 PM PDT by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Ditto

If the shoe doesn't fit... Oh, I get it. You condemn namecalling, only after you've had the last word and made the last dig!

Just tit for tat, but I'd prefer not to play that game. I can, but it doens't make either of us better people.

I'd prefer that if we want to go at each other's throats, we disagree on an issue or application of one instead of not-so-witty one word, one line insults.

If you are as aligned those issues that you cited, we probably disgree on the depth of dissappointment with Bush's decisions. I never had him pegged for anything other than a moderate so I'm not as dissappointed with him as those who were convinced that he was a Conservative or at least conservative.

312 posted on 06/05/2002 5:22:57 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
bttt
313 posted on 06/05/2002 5:23:16 PM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
Nice try. You said CAMPAIGNED against it. Let's see some quotes.
314 posted on 06/05/2002 5:25:02 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
We hold these Truths to be self evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...

Jefferson and I believe these rights come from the Creator. You chose to dissect Jefferson, the DOI and it's relation to the Constitution like some cheap lawyer. Semantic hair splitting is too kind....you debate like a shyster.

By the way, boasting about your self described "born again" status seems......well, unseemly. What does the Bible say about pride?

Regards

J.R.

315 posted on 06/05/2002 5:25:33 PM PDT by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

Comment #316 Removed by Moderator

To: SerpentDove
Why don't you just wait and see what happens to the challenge CFR is facing in the SCOTUS before you bite your nose off to spite your face. If it isn't picked apart than blame it on Bush, Congress, BushBots, and whoever you want, BUT THE FAT LADY HASN'T SUNG YET... OK?

But when your done blaming who ever you choose, remember this, If the Supreme Court says it constitutional you've lost your argument unless you can challenge it and overturn it yourself. The other thing to remember is... The Public wanted to put a stop to the unregulated soft money and until we become a dictatorship, THE PUBLIC DECIDES

317 posted on 06/05/2002 5:29:10 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
that was not a rant...it was the truth and I for one appreciate it!
318 posted on 06/05/2002 5:29:36 PM PDT by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

Comment #319 Removed by Moderator

To: My2Cents
My2Cents said: "In fact, who gave the President the authority to declare what bills are constitutional and which are not? "

Bills are unsigned legislation. The President's oath of office obligates him not to sign if the bill is unConstitutional. Since every defendant has the right of appeal to the Supreme Court, the President is justified in prosecuting cases in accordance with the laws and with the expectation that appeals will be filed.

There needs to be a way for someone like Ashcroft to prosecute gun laws based on the language of the law, but with a footnote indicating that the law is thought unconstitutional.

Since higher courts choose which cases to hear and which not, they could choose to hear a case prior to trial when the Attorney General has indicated doubts about the Constitutionality.

Although heartened by the government's filing in Emerson upholding the individual right to keep and bear arms, I believe that the higher court should be encouraged to review Emerson because other District Courts have made ridiculous rulings regarding the Second Amendment.

If the Supreme Court agrees with Ashcroft, then most of 20,000 gun laws are null and void. If the Supreme Court disagrees, then the stage is set for the Second American Revolution. Emerson will be needed for Militia service during the Second American Revolution, so he will need his right to keep and bear arms restored, since he has been found not guilty of any crime in state court.

I have previously stated that I have withdrawn my consent to be governed due to the infringements of my right to keep and bear arms. I will continue to withhold my consent until Emerson has his rights back. And all of the other people who have been jailed for keeping and bearing arms. It is unfortunate that nothing will bring back Weaver's family or the children of Waco.

320 posted on 06/05/2002 5:30:10 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,301-1,302 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson