Skip to comments.
Panel Says Top Justice Dept. Aide Held Information on Rich's Pardon (Eric Holder)
New York Times ^
| 3/13/02
| ALISON LEIGH COWAN
Posted on 03/12/2002 10:22:16 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: breakem
Yes, I think he was put there after BJ got mad at Janet...it's my opinion he was there to make sure she toed the line.
To: Judith Anne
My read was that Hubble and this guy were there to run the department and "look out" for the godfather's interest. Remember that Reno was third choice. I know they wanted a woman and i believe she got the gig because of that and that alone. By putting her in they could say, look at our girl, and do anything they damn well pleased.
22
posted on
03/13/2002 1:51:14 PM PST
by
breakem
To: breakem
Note the Kekst-Loral (Bernie Goldberg) tie. The stench is nauseating.
23
posted on
03/13/2002 2:31:11 PM PST
by
gaspar
To: gaspar
None of this is at all surprising - the corruption and deceit just keep going on and on and on...
24
posted on
03/13/2002 6:22:43 PM PST
by
Joan912
To: kayak
Thanks for the heads up!
To: Alamo-Girl
"and Loral Space and Communications." Interesante, no?
L
26
posted on
03/13/2002 8:03:53 PM PST
by
Lurker
To: breakem
Makes sense to me, breakem.
To: gaspar
the great Clinton crime family.
28
posted on
03/14/2002 9:10:04 AM PST
by
breakem
To: kattracks; PureSolace; netmilsmom; StarCMC; narses; fanfan; murphE; Mjaye; GodGunsGuts; ...
Hey, who suspected that Kattracks would still be helping us?
Thanks girl.
Digg link
29
posted on
11/19/2008 4:32:55 PM PST
by
fanfan
To: fanfan
Webb Hubbell, then Jamie Gorelick, then Eric Holder — the Clintonistas always had a #2 at DOJ to control the puppet strings, make sure that Reno did not get out of line, make sure that information and decisions were pleasing to the WH.
Now Holder is supposed to be the new AG for the Obamanation administration? Why don’t they just appoint David Kendall or Bruce Lindsey as AG? Why is Obama in bed with the Clintons anyway?
30
posted on
11/19/2008 4:40:14 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Thanks, Mediascum, you "elected" your candidate and now the country will pay....)
To: Enchante
Maybe it’s deeper than the Clintons.
Think Soros, Maurice Strong, etc.
Maybe, Zero and the Clintons are just the actors.
Holder, Gorelick,and people like them hold the Actors in check?
Sorry, just thinking out loud.
31
posted on
11/19/2008 4:48:34 PM PST
by
fanfan
To: fanfan
The Holder nomination plus all of the other Clinton-era re-treads certainly makes it look that way...... normally one would expect a President-elect in Obama’s shoes to want to appoint a lot more people personally loyal to him for their career advancement — he’s going out of his way to bring back a lot of Clinton-era people. Sure does suggest that there are more fundamental powers at play in the Democrat Party than either the Clintons or the Obamas.... SOROS!!
32
posted on
11/19/2008 4:51:55 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Thanks, Mediascum, you "elected" your candidate and now the country will pay....)
To: Enchante
Not much hope or change there, eh?
The early voting allowed voter fraud...people voting in more than one state.
You didn’t lose the election.
OTOH, John McCain would have been as much of a puppet as Zero. The problem was Palin, she was too honest, and therefore couldn’t be trusted.
33
posted on
11/19/2008 4:58:11 PM PST
by
fanfan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson