Posted on 03/08/2002 1:24:33 PM PST by sarcasm
Yes, but they can delegate it to local authorities if they choose...and just this past week, they DID choose. Seems Florida local authorities now have the authority to arrest your precious illegal aliens.
Done!
Big Bump on That.
I bump you because abortion is one thing we completely agree on. Scary to see so many willing or unwilling eugenicists on FR.
Section 245(i) -- the mini amnesty
Your immediate action is needed to fight a reinstatement of Section 245(i), a mini-amnesty for illegal aliens.
BACKGROUND
The White House at this moment is working all the levers of power to maneuver the Section 245i mini-amnesty through Congress before President Bush goes to Mexico on March 22. This would significantly increase permanent
U.S. population growth by creating a new wave of amnesty for hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens and the enticement of millions more to move here.It appears that the President apparently is willing to expend all the political capital necessary to have this amnesty in the form of a reinstatement of Section 245(i).
Section 245i allows illegal aliens who are on a waiting list to some year receive a green card as a relative or imported worker to pay a fine and be allowed to stay in this country legally until their turn arrives on the list. Why have a list, if you are going to allow anybody who jumps the line and comes here illegally to stay anyway?
Section 245i is a security risk because:
1. It allows hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens to stay permanently without going through face-to-face interviews in our embassies in their own countries, cultures and languages.
2. It allows people to remain here for years -- 20-30 years in some cases -- as something just above an illegal alien until there name comes up on a waiting list for green cards.
3. It entices millions more foreign nationals to enter the country without screening to be illegal aliens here in hopes that they also will be rewarded for their lawbreaking.
And all of that shows how a Section 245 amnesty boosts U.S. population growth.
You poor thing...I thought I had it bad with Wellstone.
That's why I never voted for Bush Jr. I thought he would follow through, like father, like son. It looks like he is continuing his father's NWO goals.
He doesn't care if he is a one termer or not. Do you really think he is in office to serve the American People? Of course not. He's there to serve the nefarious ambitions of his father and the rest of the NWO elite thugs who are out to destroy America as we know it. He and his snotty Brahmin family and their pals will go to their fantasyland in Kennebunkport behind the big walls and rule the world. Texan my ass!! Carpetbagger is more like it.
Perhaps someday you'll learn something here rather than starting that tiny little spot on your computer screen that has your screenname.
By the way, You did not post this yesterday (at least not on this thread).
Thats a federal law that enlists state law enforcement in apprehending those in violation of federal law. Try again HEEROO. The regulation in matters of immigration and naturalization is strictly a power of the federal government.
In making Immigration laws, yes, but in enforcing immigration laws, no.
Your argument was the enforcement of immigration laws. There is nothing in the US Constitution that prohibits the States from enforcing immigration laws. The states could close down their borders with Mexico and Canada if they wanted to, the protection of the state border is in the hands of the states.
"To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States."
That doesn't even come close to establishing that the federal government is empowered by the Constitution to have sole control of immigration. In fact, the word "immigration" isn't even mentioned in the section you cited.
I'm sure that you can find the federal legislation which claims this power for the federal government, but you claimed that it was in the Constitution. You would have made a better case by citing the Jurists' Amendment with its language on citizenship and naturalization.
Sorry, boy. You've run into someone who has not only read the document but who didn't even have to get out his copy to refute what you just claimed. Maybe you have read the Constitution, but you obviously disagree with its provisions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.