Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I.R.S. Audits of Working Poor Increase
New York Times ^ | March 1, 2002 | By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON

Posted on 03/04/2002 3:18:20 PM PST by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: speekinout
Scam artists are bilking African-Americans nationwide by charging them for information about a phony “slave reparation” tax credit, the latest in a line of schemes dealing with money for descendants of slaves, federal officials said Friday, October 6, 2000. The Internal Revenue Service said its tax centers nationwide all have received thousands of slave reparation-related claims in the last few months. But because there is no law allowing reparations, the IRS rejects the claims. The claims are prompted by scam artists, who charge money for the false information on how to file the claims.

Because there is no such law providing for such reparations, the IRS rejects such claims. Taxpayers who repeatedly file claims after receiving a denial notice are subject to a $500 penalty for filing a frivolous tax return.


21 posted on 03/04/2002 6:32:21 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
I just received another love letter from the IRS in today's mail. I'm assuming it's a love letter, but I haven't opened the last three or four. My blood pressure might explode if I did.
22 posted on 03/04/2002 6:40:24 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
Because there is no such law providing for such reparations, the IRS rejects such claims.

Not quite true. Until this year, the IRS hadn't noticed the scheme, and actually paid many of these claims.

23 posted on 03/04/2002 7:04:12 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Justa
Strongly suggest you read To Harass Our People by former Congressman George Hansen.
24 posted on 03/04/2002 10:25:59 PM PST by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
In the early years of the EITC, there were problems with military families claiming it.

I read the stupid tax book and it said very clearly that non-cash benefits had to be figured in before one could qualify. We never qualified because we lived in Navy housing. That didn't stop everyone my husband worked with, the neighbors, and HR and R Block from trying to get me to claim it.

Within a couple of years they began listing the amount of the housing benefit on the tax forms.

25 posted on 03/05/2002 9:44:08 AM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson