Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Free Grace
Wesley Center of Applied Theology | 1740 | John Wesley

Posted on 02/25/2002 11:01:41 PM PST by fortheDeclaration

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 1,321-1,326 next last
To: CCWoody
Does one need be a Ph.D to believe in God?
641 posted on 02/28/2002 3:17:20 PM PST by Codie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
You just don't understand the Gospel, do you?

You earn your way to hell by sinning, but God's gift to us is eternal life--if we accept that gift. Thus, no infant who dies goes to hell as they have not yet sinned.

642 posted on 02/28/2002 3:18:11 PM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
In fact, we have been very effective in showing that the non-Calvinists here don't even know what the Gospel is, let alone articulate it.)

Yup, really satisfying it must be to know it all. That secret handshake is really nifty too. You guys have every reason to be proud and self-satisfied (in addition to being omnisicient of course). It is such a winning presentation of the Gospel.

But of course I forgot. Since the presentation of the Gospel is just 'going through the motions' (since no one can accept it anyway -- it was all decided before the foundation of the world) it doesn't make any difference how obnoxious your preening now makes it seem. Isn't that the theory?

It's no wonder that there are about a half dozen of you hard-shell Calvinists left in the world. But you can have all the fun of telling each other how much smarter you are than everyone else. That's the ticket. That'll really impress the uninitiated. Let's see the thumb goes over the little finger, right?

643 posted on 02/28/2002 3:18:29 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: Codie
No, you don't--but these people just want to overawe you into their flawed system of belief--because they cannot logically persuade anyone that they are correct.
644 posted on 02/28/2002 3:19:25 PM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M, shadowace, ward smythe, forthedeclaration
A CALVINIST CONSTRUCT

These definitions are all either offered by calvinists on this thread or are condensations of definitions on this site recommended by JerryM: Calvinist Tulip Definition Site recommended by Jerry

T - - Total Depravity means that Natural Man is totally sinful and does not ever WANT in his own spirit to know Christ.

U - - Unconditional Election means that God has elected for His own glory, in accordance with His own will and without regard for the merit of those elected, some for salvation and some to be left in their sins.

L - - Limited Atonement means that Christ died specifically and only for the sins of those who would ever truly believe in Him.

I - - Irresistible Grace means that the elect are incapable of resisting the inward call to repentance and salvation by the Holy Spirit..

P - - Perseverance of the Saints means that all those who are truly saved will certainly be brought to heaven and to glorification and will never be lost.

645 posted on 02/28/2002 3:29:52 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
I'm Catholic,ain't a Protestant alive that can convince me that their right.I find it curious however,that in the absence of a common enemy ,you attack each other.Why?
646 posted on 02/28/2002 3:35:14 PM PST by Codie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
I don't know what that meant.
647 posted on 02/28/2002 3:40:30 PM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
Perhaps instead of thinking that you are filthy and vile when compared to God, you could think that, since you are not God, and a human, you are merely different. Do you think animals are filthy and vile creatures because they are not like you?
648 posted on 02/28/2002 3:43:28 PM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Why would it be so hard to think that I was adopted?
649 posted on 02/28/2002 3:44:35 PM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
I have seen this everywhere, what is an Arminian?
650 posted on 02/28/2002 3:47:09 PM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies]

To: Codie
attack each other...why?

Because there is no such religion as "protestant." That word is a descriptive used by historians to identify a number of movements that objected to catholic excesses and erroneous theology during the middle ages.

There are Anglicans, Presbyterians, Baptists, etc., etc. They are as different from each other as they are from catholicism. In fact, catholicism is simply another denomination in terms of today's world.

651 posted on 02/28/2002 3:49:20 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: xzins
A CALVINIST CONSTRUCT

These definitions are all either offered by calvinists on this thread or are condensations of definitions on this site recommended by JerryM: Calvinist Tulip Definition Site recommended by Jerry

T - - Total Depravity means that Natural Man is totally sinful and does not ever WANT in his own spirit to know Christ.

U - - Unconditional Election means that God has elected for His own glory, in accordance with His own will and without regard for the merit of those elected, some for salvation and some to be left in their sins.

L - - Limited Atonement means that Christ died specifically and only for the sins of those who would ever truly believe in Him.

I - - Irresistible Grace means that the elect are incapable of resisting the Holy Spirit's inward call to repentance and salvation.

P - - Perseverance of the Saints means that all those who are truly saved will certainly be brought to heaven and to glorification and will never be lost.

652 posted on 02/28/2002 3:51:12 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
This is Wesley's view:

The Question, "What Is an Arminian?" Answered by a Lover of Free Grace

The first paragraph: To say, "This man is an Arminian," has the same effect on many hearers, as to say, "This is a mad dog." It puts them into a fright at once: They run away from him with all speed and diligence; and will hardly stop, unless it be to throw a stone at the dreadful and mischievous animal.

Arminianism is based on the teachings of JAMES HARMENS, in Latin, Jacobes Arminius who lived in the late 1500s, early 1600s.

Woody and his friends will present a different picture of Arminius.

653 posted on 02/28/2002 4:02:08 PM PST by Ward Smythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: xzins
A little more readable in green, no less frightening.
654 posted on 02/28/2002 4:03:02 PM PST by Ward Smythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: xzins, the_doc, Jerry_M, RnMomof7, CCWoody
"A Calvinist Construct" Rejected

Among other things, I object to the wording of Points "L" and "I" (Point "L" is poorly worded. Point "I" is downright incorrectly worded).

I will offer to correct the wording of these two points; but I will respectfully refuse to offer this correction until after the Arminians will offer a one-sentence summation of their Objection to the First Point, Total Depravity.

I also advise my fellow Calvinists NOT to accept xzins' "Calvinist Construct" as constituting a definition of Calvinism until such time as I have corrected the mis-statements of Points "L" and "I". We will not acknowledge the "Construct" as reflecting our views.

As I said, I will correct the wording of "L" and "I" (which I know to be incorrectly stated) and mull over the wording of "U" and "P" after I have been supplied with a one-sentence objection to Point "T".

However, I will NOT offer these corrections UNTIL a one-sentence objection to Point "T" is offered; and until I have made my corrections, we will not acknowledge the "Construct" as being respresentative of our views AT ALL.

Excepting, of course, point T, which is correctly stated, and which we are prepared to debate.

655 posted on 02/28/2002 4:05:53 PM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
My Comment: Just the true offer of Life Everlasting and Life Abundant if we "believe in Jesus Christ" (Paul's words to the Phillipian jailer, not mine).

Your response: Gosh, I am all a tingle!

You should be. That's the most exciting news in the history of the world. Truly Good News to -- I know this is hard for you to hear -- everyone.

656 posted on 02/28/2002 4:06:50 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Thank God ,Christ is merciful.
657 posted on 02/28/2002 4:07:12 PM PST by Codie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
The Cross was not a transaction between God and Man.
The Cross was a transaction between the Father and the Son.

Would you be kind enough good sir to post some scripture for this!

658 posted on 02/28/2002 4:07:19 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: Codie
Does one need be a Ph.D to believe in God?

No, but the Bible does clearly say what a man needs to believe?

So, how does a man believe in Christ?

659 posted on 02/28/2002 4:09:15 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce, winstonchurchill, Jerry_M, CCWoody, RnMomof7
You just don't understand the Gospel, do you? You earn your way to hell by sinning, but God's gift to us is eternal life--if we accept that gift. Thus, no infant who dies goes to hell as they have not yet sinned.

So, is Christ's Atonement intended for those dying in Infancy?

If not, how can you claim to believe in Universal Intent of Atonement? When you say that Christ died for all, of the world, do you not in fact mean that Christ died for the sins of "all, the world -- except dying infants, who require no atonement"??

If this is what you mean, then we shall put the lie to the Arminian claim that he believes in a universal intent of Atonement. You do not.

So -- is the Atonement intended for those who die in infancy, or is it not??

660 posted on 02/28/2002 4:11:40 PM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 1,321-1,326 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson