Skip to comments.
Bush Administration Lawyers Defending Hillary - Gratis
NewsMax ^
| 2/21/02
| Limbacher
Posted on 02/20/2002 4:21:45 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 301-310 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator
Comment #102 Removed by Moderator
To: ratcat
Are you an attorney with Judical Watch ?
103
posted on
02/20/2002 8:12:16 PM PST
by
Darlin'
To: ratcat
Lawsuit hold over from Clinton Administration, the Justice Department was already involved in, right?
To: ratcat
"Ms. Hall was retaliated against when she raised questions about the legality of the White House database (WHODB) and other activities."
Don't you mean Ms Hall believes she was retaliated against ? Isn't that what the court will decide... if, indeed, she was retaliated against ?
105
posted on
02/20/2002 8:23:04 PM PST
by
Darlin'
Comment #106 Removed by Moderator
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This really stinks if it's really going on.
MM
Comment #108 Removed by Moderator
To: ratcat
I hope the Bush administration turns around on this - "Big Time."
To: ratcat
So, you think NOW the Justice Department is involved in it?
To: Letitring
Yes, you are right. (It is a holdover case from the Clinton adminstration)
To: Kangaroo Court
:). Of course. It's late here, see you good people tomorrow.
To: RJCogburn
It is sad enough that Bush/Ashcroft dropped the campaign finance investigation...which means Chinagate....which means national security. It is further sad that they refuse to release information regarding the thinking that led J. Reno to not appoint an IC for this (and that they continue to coverup, it seems, the FBI's corruption in Boston). The Screw Party system knows how to protect itself. With each passing day I see less and less difference between the 2 parties.
113
posted on
02/20/2002 8:34:55 PM PST
by
WRhine
Comment #114 Removed by Moderator
To: ratcat
Reread the second bold paragraph in your reply #98 and ask yourself if the Bush Justice Dept is entitled to less than the Clinton Justice Dept.
To: DoughtyOne
BTTT. I agree completely.
116
posted on
02/20/2002 8:52:06 PM PST
by
WRhine
Comment #117 Removed by Moderator
Comment #118 Removed by Moderator
To: ratcat
Look who's obstructing justice now. What do you mean "now"? Bubba-2 has been covering for Bubba-1 and Bubbette! ever since day 1,and the suppressed reports of the WH being trashed by the Dims leaving. Months ago he blocked investigations into voter fraud and pardon selling by the previous Bubba's.
See your new Bubba? He's the same as your old Bubba.
To: Howlin
I just cannot get OVER people buying into this PR from Klayman without looking into it. What I can't get over are the people who blindly follow Bubba-2 and who are willing to make any excuse for anything he does. Face it,so far he has been to the left of Bubba-1 on everything he has done. He's created new bureaucracies,spent more on public education that even the Dims wanted,created the so-called Patriot's Act,as well as the "Office of Reich Security". He has further stated that he will sign anti-gun legislation if Congress sends it to him,and that he wants to make "instant citizens" out of 3 million illegal Mexican aliens.
We would have been far better off if Goober had won the election.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 301-310 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson