Skip to comments.
Howitzer progress; New gun on target in testing
MCAS Yuma (USMC Web Site)
| Feb. 15, 2002
| Cpl. Kyle Davidson
Posted on 02/19/2002 5:30:55 AM PST by LavaDog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
For all you "Cannon Cocker" FReepers.
1
posted on
02/19/2002 5:30:56 AM PST
by
LavaDog
To: LavaDog; SLB; Matthew James
Incoming!
To: LavaDog
It was only 20 years ago we were still using the 105 along with the 155. I think they were Korean War leftovers - - man they were old. Nice to see the Marines are finally helping to lead the way with new merchandise rather than wait for Army throwoffs.
I remember in the early '80s, in the FDC, making the switch from charts and protractors to the TI calculator (with the fancy template). I sure hope the Marines are advancing their FDC technology as well as their guns.
Semper Fidelis,
LH
To: LavaDog
Post the link. I need to send this article to someone, sans commentary.
4
posted on
02/19/2002 5:47:10 AM PST
by
Rebelbase
To: Rebelbase
It can be found off top of page at usmc.mil
5
posted on
02/19/2002 5:54:04 AM PST
by
donozark
To: LavaDog
FIRE FOR EFFECT!!!
6
posted on
02/19/2002 6:01:49 AM PST
by
soycd
To: Rebelbase
Rebel, Sorry I'm a Grunt and do not know how to post links but the story is on www.usmc.mil.
7
posted on
02/19/2002 6:02:42 AM PST
by
LavaDog
To: LavaDog
I am happy to see the M198 finally heading for the museum. It was born in the late 60's/early 70's as a response to the Russian's field gun with extreme range (dispite destroying the hearing of the crew). I remember the cover of the Field Artillery Journel when they trumpetted "We've Got Thirty?) (km).
While living in northern California, I watched the 155 Battalion from the 7th ID convoy down 101 to Camp Bob, knowing that they needed a special license and clearance from CalTrans to haul their 198s because of their length.
The 777 is going to be a grand addition to the Redlegs of the Corps and hopefully, the light forces of the US Army.
"Not all are priviledged to be Field Artillerymen!"
To: LavaDog
I thought the Marines had thier towed weapon. The M40A3! (hehe)
To: LavaDog
10
posted on
02/19/2002 6:09:41 AM PST
by
paul544
To: PatrioticAmerican
The 82nd abn could use this big time as it would greatly increase ability to stay light with more firepower... I would imagine 101 abn (air-assault) would be heavy on the shopping list as well.
To: LavaDog
To: PatrioticAmerican
Even if you're trying to be funny, the M40A3 is a direct-fire weapon; the M777 is of course an indirect-fire weapon, better suited to transport by Marine aircraft- rotary wing for now, and maybe the Osprey someday- than the Army's preferred self-propelled tracked artillery pieces.
Though the one pictured here has an Army crew, it goes bang pretty much the same no matter who yanks the rope. Whether it hits what it's aimed toward can be another matter, but both services have some pretty fair cannoncockers and gunbunnies.
13
posted on
02/19/2002 6:16:00 AM PST
by
archy
To: LavaDog
Finally! Something I can tow with the Land Rover!
14
posted on
02/19/2002 6:18:02 AM PST
by
eno_
To: Lancey Howard
It was only 20 years ago we were still using the 105 along with the 155. I think they were Korean War leftovers - - man they were old ... Back in the "old" Corps when I served (10th Marines - Camp Lejeune) the 105's in our Battery were mostly WWII vintage, probably via Korea. Every 6 to 8 years they were taken out of service and shipped to Albany GA for refurbishing. The Marine Corps takes pride in making equipment last.
15
posted on
02/19/2002 6:27:11 AM PST
by
BluH2o
To: soycd
Repeat!
16
posted on
02/19/2002 6:29:25 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: rbmillerjr
For those of you who were stationed at bragg, you might remeber my unit's (A 1/321 (reflagged from 1/39)) cadence... "The big guns go - Boom Boom, The little guns go - to the eighty second!"
To: eno_
Only if you pass the background check and 24hr waiting period.
18
posted on
02/19/2002 6:33:49 AM PST
by
LavaDog
To: LavaDog
This low profile gun that can propel a 39-caliber round a maximum range of 18.9 miles, ... Wouldn't the barrel be 39 calibers, and not the round?
19
posted on
02/19/2002 6:38:53 AM PST
by
Junior
To: Junior
nah...they had to do something to get the range, so it is a sharply shouldered cartridge.....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson