Skip to comments.
TRULOCK CASE AGAINST WEN HO LEE DISMISSED AT REQUEST OF PRESIDENT BUSH
Judicial Watch ^
| February 12, 2002
| Press release
Posted on 02/12/2002 6:15:54 PM PST by tgslTakoma
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-172 next last
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
, but we need to know the truth of what the last president did. To do anything else is dereliction of duty. I agree, but what if it would cause national panic? There's a lot of weak people in this country. FReepers are special. Good looking, strong, and above average.
To: VA Advogado
Fair enough. You're the village idiot.
To: Fred Mertz
damn... Notra is a hero... timing is bad on this oneb
23
posted on
02/12/2002 7:12:49 PM PST
by
blackbag
To: tgslTakoma
Can I get on someone's bump list that'll advise when Ashcroft ever actually does anything?
24
posted on
02/12/2002 7:14:35 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: concerned about politics
Good looking, strong, and above average. Shades of Praire Home Companion
25
posted on
02/12/2002 7:15:01 PM PST
by
blackbag
To: tgslTakoma
...besides obfuscate and rhetoricize.
26
posted on
02/12/2002 7:16:13 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: Fred Mertz
You're the village idiot.
Take the mirror away from your face and try again Ferd.
To: tgslTakoma
This press release doesn't include any statements from the DOJ or the Court.
It is useless to a reasonable person.
28
posted on
02/12/2002 7:18:49 PM PST
by
mrsmith
To: VA Advogado
But it's true.
To: blackbag
Indeed.
To: tgslTakoma; Judicial Watch
Good call! Prepare for the attack of the Kool-Aid-drinking, Bush-pimping Klayman-haters! However, I thought Mr. Lee was ultimately cleared of his charges.
To: tgslTakoma
Wen Ho Lee is innocent. He was persecuted by Clintonistas because he fit the profile - and Bill Richardson didn't.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
SERIOUSLY. HAS JUDICIAL WATCH EVER WON A CASE?
HAVE THEY PUT ANYONE IN JAIL OR PUNISHED THEM?
HAVE THEY BROUGHT THE CLINTONS TO JUSTICE?
I used to contribute to JW but have stopped.
I will do it again when I see some results.
To: Alamo-Girl,amom
FYI ping
To: Alamo-Girl,amom
FYI ping
To: onedoug; tgslTakoma
Can I get on someone's bump list that'll advise when A-G Janet Ashcroft ever actually does anything?
I vote for him and Colon Powell to take a lunch together -- or, better yet, a hike!
To: ValerieUSA
I am out here in New Mexico(the scene of the crime)so I know a little about all this (probably very little)....The case against Lee was embarrasing at best,Richardson and some of his co-horts bear a lot of responsibility,and I still believe Trulock was a goodguy....A big fat mess all around,with the Clinton administration's smudged and greasy prints on it all.
37
posted on
02/12/2002 7:46:23 PM PST
by
woofie
To: Fred Mertz
just days before trial, which was scheduled to begin February 19, the full weight of the Bush Justice Department was used by the administration to intervene in Judicial Watch's private cases for Trulock, to argue that if the trial was allowed to proceed, that national security would be violated. A defamation suit, and national security could be violated?
Stay well Fred, we could be in for some really rough times.
To: doug from upland; ChaseR
Doug, I sure hope someone gets a second chance to ask the President some questions.
To: OKCSubmariner
!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-172 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson