Posted on 02/04/2002 11:41:47 AM PST by kattracks
If a president can appoint someone to a lesser term than the full term then, the president has control over that appointee. Played out to its extreme the president could theoretically set a month to month appointment and hold back renewal of that appointment when actions are not in line with the presidents wishes. This subverts the intent of independence as well as the narrow requirements to remove someone.
I believe the above eliminates the logic of Billy's first reason and he is back to merely the intent of congress questions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.