[jimkress]

If nothing is "blocking" the warming, then the climate isn't as sensitive as the climate modelers had assumed.

These pseudo-scientists have never done a sensitivity analysis of their models - something that competent scientists that work in the field of math modeling know is a prerequiste before you ever make any predictions. A proper sensitivity analysis would have displayed these kinds of flaws in the 'climate models', thus confirming that the predictions of 'global warming' were incorrect. However, that would not have met the agenda being pushed by the 'global warming' advocates so they sacrified scientific validity for political gain.

[oldvike]

This man's switch on global warming will do nothing to slow down the environmental whacko crowd. And teachers will continue to teach our children that global warming is happening. So, while this story is nice and vindicates us conservatives in our own minds, it means basically nothing. Thanks for posting it, though.

[callisto]

What a wonderful find. Keep up the good work!

[A. Pole]

Bump. No danger of global worming. And no chance to see Greenland green again during our life.

[Goblins]

What I am most interested in is the ice content of the earth. The ice acts like a thermostat, and helps maintain a fairly constant temperature on the earth by using energy to melt. If one can see a consistant deterioration or the worlds ice content then one could assume an increase of energy upon the earth. Not that green house gases might have anything to do with it if there was a marked decrease but that is what I would look for instead of world climate changes.