Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE EFFECTS OF REGENERATION - Calvinism
http://w3.gorge.net/braveheart/arthurw.htm ^ | Unknown | A.W. Pink

Posted on 02/01/2002 5:26:40 AM PST by CCWoody

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 661-669 next last
To: moyden; Jerry_M
Every church teaches this. How does your "regeneration" differ from others?

Perhaps you mean that all true Christian churches teach this. "My" regeneration is based upon a Biblical understanding of the true state of the unregenerate man. However, all true Christian churches teach that a man must be born again to inherit eternal life.

So, when you die, what next? Will your self-awareness simply fade into oblivion or will you persist for all eternity? Your choices today will determine what will be your state for all eternity.

61 posted on 02/04/2002 8:06:37 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
How can dead men find things? What's the difference between this and the Calvinist belief that a dead man can't believe, etc.?
62 posted on 02/04/2002 8:07:53 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
So I would be right then - Calvinists believe that man can't 'find' the narrow path - that scripture really means something else when it uses the term find? I'm curious - what do you think that passage means?
63 posted on 02/04/2002 8:10:18 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
"What's the difference between this and the Calvinist belief that a dead man can't believe, etc.?"

You have simply re-worded the same strawman argument. - where did you get it? - Calvin never said it.

64 posted on 02/04/2002 8:13:09 AM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
By the way, which "bizarre belief" are you refering to? Calvinism? If so, you may have misunderstood my post - I am not a Calvinist.
65 posted on 02/04/2002 8:13:15 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Childish twisting of words has never stood in place of honest debate. - I see your agenda.

Good-bye!

66 posted on 02/04/2002 8:15:55 AM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
So I would be right then - Calvinists believe that man can't 'find' the narrow path - that scripture really means something else when it uses the term find? I'm curious - what do you think that passage means?

I posted a scripture verse to you. Did God "fib" when he said that Adam would die that day?

Ephesians 2:1 And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins...

Isaiah 65:1 "I was sought by those who did not ask for Me; I was found by those who did not seek Me. I said, "Here I am, here I am,' to a nation that was not called by My name.

P.S. Have you read the article?
67 posted on 02/04/2002 8:19:50 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
LOL Twisting of words? What words have I twisted? Wow, take a chill pill, man. No need to get so nasty.
68 posted on 02/04/2002 8:31:16 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Yes, you did post a scripture, and no, God does not lie. That does not mean that you and I will interpret what He said in the same way.
69 posted on 02/04/2002 8:32:23 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Greetings Woody - I have a serious question for someone a bit sharper than me (includes most, I know) - Calvin was a religious man, as was Wesley - lets for sake of argument say both made it to heaven - who was right ?
70 posted on 02/04/2002 8:32:38 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
Biblical doctrine v. humanism.

Well, now, finally a point that I can understand. And, I agree. Politics without moral structure ultimately leads to totalitarianism. Christianity seeks to discipline physical appetites for a higher good, humanism worships appetite AS the higher good.

Democracy and freedom cannot exist without personal responsibility, which in turn cannot exist without the discipline of moral code. Therefore, democracy and humanism are antipathetic.

71 posted on 02/04/2002 8:32:53 AM PST by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Okay, so man is not completely spiritually dead? That he can 'find' things and chose to 'believe'? Where are you on the Calvinist spectrum? Perhaps that's where the misunderstanding is arising.
72 posted on 02/04/2002 8:34:23 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911; CCWoody; RnMomof7
Calvin was a religious man, as was Wesley - lets for sake of argument say both made it to heaven - who was right ?

Due to the fact that both men trusted in Christ, and Christ alone, for salvation, both were right.

Now, while I appreciate John Wesley (and even wear a copy of his signet ring on my right hand), I would have to say that John Calvin was a more diligent and thoughtful theologian than Wesley. I fully expect that the two of them are able to fellowship together as brothers at the feet of Christ.

73 posted on 02/04/2002 8:38:39 AM PST by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
post #35 and #37 exemplify what I stated
74 posted on 02/04/2002 8:42:00 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
I fully expect that the two of them are able to fellowship together as brothers at the feet of Christ.

Amen Jesus

75 posted on 02/04/2002 8:43:41 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911; CCWoody; RnMomof7
Follow-up to my 73.

I also believe that John Wesley has made a posthumous apology to his old friend George Whitfield by now, and that the two of them are also enjoying fellowship at the throne of Christ.

76 posted on 02/04/2002 8:44:52 AM PST by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911
Finding Jesus clears your mind and fills your heart and soul with his spirit. You are then deemed to full fill the calling of God. This is what I believe GW is doing. Although he is a political man, his heart if with God and Christ. For no man is good and can only seek salvation thru Christ, the only way to change evil is to have them come to Christ. If they choose not then they goto hell.
77 posted on 02/04/2002 8:49:07 AM PST by Baseballguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

It appears that Race is unaware that the Calvinistic ("particular") Baptists took root in this country while non-Calvinistic ("general") Baptists "generally" did not. To a man, all of the founders of the Southern Baptist Convention were Calvinists. The historic Baptist Calvinistic statement of faith is the 1689 London Baptist Confession, modelled on the Westminster Confession.

The Baptist author of Pilgrim's Progress, John Bunyan, was a Calvinist.

The Baptist "Father of the Modern Missionary Movement", William Carey, was a Calvinist.

The greatest Baptist preacher of all time, Charles Haddon Spurgeon, was a Calvinist. Many a non-Calvinistic Baptist preacher has Spurgeon's Sermons on his bookshelf, and is also beholden to a vast number of Calvinistic predecessors..

One of the foremost Baptist theologians of our day, John Piper, is the pastor of the Bethlehem Baptist Church of Minneapolis, and is a Calvinist.

Baptists can, and are, Calvinists, and are becoming more so every day, whether Race believes it or not.

78 posted on 02/04/2002 8:57:20 AM PST by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Revelation911; Racebannon; the_doc
Oops, my last to the two of you and doc. Sorry.
79 posted on 02/04/2002 8:58:12 AM PST by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
"Where are you on the Calvinist spectrum?"

There are those who will never believe. - No amount of effort on the part of others will be sufficient to bring these individuals to the Lord. - The Lord knew at the day of creation who these were, just as he knew who would believe.

Are you asking if I believe that there is no need, or purpose for evangelism? - I do not. - I believe that we are tools of the Holy Spirit, and follow his leading. - When people are 'led to the Lord' it is not our doing, but the Holy spirit working through us. - We cannot lead someone to the Lord at will.

80 posted on 02/04/2002 9:03:01 AM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 661-669 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson