Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE EFFECTS OF REGENERATION - Calvinism
http://w3.gorge.net/braveheart/arthurw.htm ^ | Unknown | A.W. Pink

Posted on 02/01/2002 5:26:40 AM PST by CCWoody

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 661-669 next last
To: CCWoody
Hey, you're stealing my best lines.

None of this changes the fact that your nutcake religious views do not belong on Freerepublic. This is a board about P-O-L-I-T-I-C-S.

Here's a tip: When you do post this blather, put it in concise, modern English. The modern use of a four hundred year old writing style does not make your loopy ideas look more important - simply overblown and insecure.

21 posted on 02/01/2002 2:40:11 PM PST by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Bump
For later reading.
22 posted on 02/01/2002 2:46:16 PM PST by DreamWeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moyden
You may not like it but Max is a Calvinist my friend..as is Yancy..and many others that glorify God with the written word..
23 posted on 02/01/2002 4:06:15 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: moyden;RnMomof7;CCWoody;Aggressive Calvinist
nutcake...blather...loopy...

These words could get you banned on other threads. But Calvinists take your rude ignorance and juvenile criticism in stride.

Although you're obviously unaware of it, there are 400 years of written theology behind these discussions which many think worth reading.

You're free to find your own topics. Allow others the same choice.

24 posted on 02/01/2002 4:22:27 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Good read. Thanks.

Hey, how 'bout that weather??? Walking across campus was a challange!!

25 posted on 02/01/2002 5:38:01 PM PST by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jude24
My cable link is out..I am on anothers computer now.

Very dangerous out there be careful!

26 posted on 02/01/2002 5:40:11 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
A big Pink bump!

Romans 9:15 &16 "For He saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy."

27 posted on 02/01/2002 6:14:20 PM PST by Mahone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: moyden; OrthodoxPresbyterian
None of this changes the fact that your nutcake religious views do not belong on Freerepublic. This is a board about P-O-L-I-T-I-C-S.

I have noticed while surfing through your wonderfully inciteful political comments of the day that you seem to reserve your bigotry only for those of us in the Reformed faith.

What is funny is that the very faith that you mock was the founding influence in the political system you have mastered so well with your "crisco orgy" comments. When you mature enough to understand what I have posted above, you may learn that it is correct.

"gig" that

28 posted on 02/01/2002 8:09:24 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: moyden;CCWoody
None of this changes the fact that your nutcake religious views do not belong on Freerepublic. This is a board about P-O-L-I-T-I-C-S.

Some of us would say this isn't "POLITICS??"

We are a community here.Sometimes I read and bookmark recipes. I loved some of the now deleted vanities where people "play " with each other. There are threads on the Superbowl and NASCAR..

Lighten up..if this thread offends you just do not read it..I do not read alot of passes for "news" on FR that is smut..you are free to not to read or participate on spiritual threads..

29 posted on 02/03/2002 9:36:38 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Aggressive Calvinist;CCWoody
Many are called but few are choosen...nope never the majority

Christ had 12..120 in the upper room and God was in control through it all!

30 posted on 02/03/2002 10:08:55 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
These words could get you banned on other threads. But Calvinists take your rude ignorance and juvenile criticism in stride.

You are so right. It is the Calvinists that most appreciate the right to free speech and freedom to worship..

It took me a while to figure out that it has to do with assurance..If you are afraid of having your beliefs examined the button is your friend:>)

31 posted on 02/03/2002 10:15:19 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Not being a church-goer, I couldn't tell a "Reformist" from a "Calvinist". As far I as I can tell, the primary goal of the "Reformist" is to label anyone with a slightly alternative view as an evil, bound for hell "Calvinist".

No matter. The pompous meanderings of one Mr. A.W. Pink have no place on a political board. For all I know, he is 100% correct, but the self-righteous, accusatory tone of he and his followers is unlikely to persuade anyone.

32 posted on 02/04/2002 4:58:35 AM PST by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: moyden; Jerry_M; RnMomof7
Well, I'm a Calvinist. I posted this thread. It seems that you know less about Christianity than you do about Politics. Go figure!

BTW, there will come a day in your future when you will die. What will happen to you then?

33 posted on 02/04/2002 6:00:15 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: moyden
So do you think the Superbowl thread has any political meaning?

Reformed theology was what brought the Pilgrims here.

As for condeming anyone to hell?? That is God's job.

34 posted on 02/04/2002 6:12:25 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: moyden; CCWoody; RnMomof7
moyden, how did you come to have your political viewpoint? Could it possibly be due to the fact that your political viewpoint is determined by your worldview, which is dependent upon your religious views?

There can be no substantive discussion of politics without an understanding of religion. As such, religious discussion (within the bounds of decency) is allowed on FreeRepublic. The PC nazis haven't yet banished religion from this forum.

BTW, you might be interested in this thread. It predates your membership on FreeRepublic by almost a year, and is a great primer on why religious discussion is necessary in order to have coherent political discussion.

However, the important question is this: Why do you hate Pink's article?

35 posted on 02/04/2002 6:19:00 AM PST by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M;*Calvin
Thanks fpor the link Jerry. I never put that on the Calvin bump list..or this one eithor..doing it now
36 posted on 02/04/2002 6:31:00 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
Nice article, Jerry.

Jerry's thread

As opposed to the A.W. Pink stuff, your post is:

1. Readable

2. Has some bearing on politics.

I suppose that, in addition to Calvinism, the rise of fundamentalism on the American frontier grew from a desire to escape a centralized church structure. The pioneers looked to the Bible as the only source of truth which they could interpret themselves - free from the strictures of East Coast or European church government.

37 posted on 02/04/2002 6:44:49 AM PST by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: moyden
OK, I'll bite.

What is the central disagreement between the "Calvinists" and the "Reformists"?

38 posted on 02/04/2002 6:51:57 AM PST by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: moyden; CCWoody; RnMomof7
au contraire, the Pink sermon on regeneration and the natural state of man has a tremendous bearing on politics. At the same time, I didn't have any trouble both reading and understanding it.

The fact that you don't see the political relevance of Pink's sermon is understandable, but is still not valid grounds for your attempt at censorship. Why do you hate the content of this sermon?

39 posted on 02/04/2002 6:52:24 AM PST by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: moyden
The "reformers" are "Calvinists". The "reformers" get their names from the Protestant Reformation, and are Augustinian predestinarians. John Calvin produced the most comprehensive documentation of the theology of the Reformation, his Institutes of the Christian Religion. Thus, those holding to this reformed theology are commonly referred to as Calvinists.

You were quick earlier to state that hardly anyone holds to these beliefs today. On what did you base this, seeing as you aren't even sure what the terminology represents?

While I am in agreement with others here who have stated that it is not important to be in the majority in order to be correct (Jesus said that only a few would find the narrow way), you might be surprised that there is a huge following of these doctrines during our time, with a return to these tenets being seen in many places.

40 posted on 02/04/2002 6:58:09 AM PST by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 661-669 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson