Skip to comments.
JUDICIAL WATCH UNCOVERS 1.8 MILLION CLINTON WHITE HOUSE E-MAIL
Judicial Watch e-mail ^
| January 17, 2002
| JW
Posted on 01/17/2002 10:38:33 AM PST by litany_of_lies
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-143 next last
To: litany_of_lies
If the press release truly represents the fact there should be some people going to jail for contempt of court. There also should be a justice department investigation to find and prosecute those responsible for obstrution of justice. I suspect that the release is truthful but I doubt anyone will suffer the consequences of their contempt and obstruction.
To: thinden
thinden said: "...like the original whitewater, the statutes will run before anything of consequence comes out of this."
The original crimes and conspiracies may become too old for charges, but I thought that any provable obstruction or perjury restarts the clock. Is that not so?
To: William Tell, FreePaul
I believe that obstruction of justice starts the statute of limitations clock all over again. I also believe that Judge Lamberth can cite, and sentence. proven obstructors or liars in front of his court for contempt, and doesn't need DOJ's help to do so (which is good, because DOJ is asleep on anything that doesn't relate to 09/11).
bttt
To: BluH2o
"My experience with JW (and I've made contributions in the past ... not recently) they always seem to come up empty. They may have something here, but I'm not optimistic ... we'll see. If nothing else it may give the Clintonistas a few sleepless nights." Vampires don't sleep
105
posted on
01/18/2002 12:53:17 PM PST
by
klgator
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Nothing will come of this. Nothing ever does.my thoughts, exactly!
106
posted on
01/20/2002 5:35:48 PM PST
by
ken21
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Nothing will come of this. Nothing ever does."![]( http://www.hvizdos.com/eeyore.gif )
Chin up Eeyore. We'll get 'em!
To: WIladyconservative
Don't worry about the price too much. Odds of this being true are slim.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Interesting, but Klayman seems to be somewhat of a nutcase with his cheerleading press releases like this one. What's he supposed to do when few others seem to care?
To: Alamo-Girl
DSL ping
To: litany_of_lies
bttt
To: litany_of_lies
How IS Larry Klayman?
What is the deal?
I saw him Thursday night (I think) at the annual MRC Media Dishonors Awards Dinner in D.C. and he looked thin & was so subdued and ill-looking, I wasn't even sure it was Larry, but he responded when I said hello and we talked, briefly.
He looked VERY ill.
I am worried for him.
(If it wasn't Larry, it was someone else Named Larry, who resembled Klayman; honestly, he was so subdued, I cannot be absolutley sure it was Klayman.
To: BeAChooser; goldilucky; KLT; SnowBunny; Bigg Red; GretchenEE; flamefront; Black Jade...
"Sorry but I'm just hearing more DEFLECTION and EXCUSES from those attacking Klayman the loudest." 42 posted on 1/17/02 2:03 PM Pacific by BeAChooser
EXACTLY!
113
posted on
01/20/2002 8:47:48 PM PST
by
ChaseR
To: TPartyType
Hi there!!! It is soooo good to see you! Thank you for the heads up!
To: litany_of_lies
Can we get a change of venue from D.C. because of all the publicity? I'd like that.
115
posted on
01/20/2002 9:42:21 PM PST
by
185JHP
To: 185JHP
Change of venue would normally make sense, but with Lamberth as the judge on this case, I'd rather it stay in DC.
To: litany_of_lies
Lamberth is a stand-up guy. I was thinking about a D.C. jury.
117
posted on
01/20/2002 10:20:38 PM PST
by
185JHP
To: litany_of_lies; Registered
118
posted on
01/21/2002 3:43:50 AM PST
by
Mia T
To: ChaseR
evening bump!
Comment #120 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson