Skip to comments.
Liberals Send Threatening E-Mails to Enron Journalists - 'Dig Harder' or else
Short Cuts Morning Update ^
| January 11, 2001
| L Dotter's Staff Reporters
Posted on 01/11/2002 6:27:20 AM PST by codebreaker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: codebreaker
>The Hillary vote scandal story will break soon, that is the one I would focus on.
Can you point me to a thread on this? I did a search and couldn't come up with it.
thanks, Dave
To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the heads up!
To: codebreaker
It was 1400+ votes not 14000+.
63
posted on
01/11/2002 7:56:17 AM PST
by
hflynn
To: tangerine
Democrat-voting friends ...unlimited knee-jerk insults to ... their ... faith... Lessee, that must mean they're either Wiccans caught up in sacrificing, homosexual pedophiles, or UBL-trained terrorists, right?
HF
64
posted on
01/11/2002 8:18:16 AM PST
by
holden
To: codebreaker
Flattering photogenics are worth a thousand words to Dims. We know how they're disproportionately stimulated by imagery, and how relatively little of the written truth they comprehend.
HF
65
posted on
01/11/2002 8:23:35 AM PST
by
holden
To: codebreaker
From an MBA in Finance:
Get ready to be bored out of your ever-lovin' minds. This story will get very tehnical and the press will not understand a word of it. It'll go away fast due to the links with Clinton and his people, as well with current congressional critters.
To: DJ88
Lay may never have dicussed the financial status of Enron but I'm certain Cheney did after each of the 6 meetings.
People are now saying the reason we don't see Cheney is because he's ducking a supoena (sp?), btw, I just heard a company lost 400,000,000 in their retirement account because of Enron.
To: holden
Lessee, that must mean they're either Wiccans caught up in sacrificing, homosexual pedophiles, or UBL-trained terrorists, right? It might also mean they are hard working, responsible, level-headed, caring adults capable of thinking and deciding for themselves -- and are not going to change their vote or their mind based on anything they might see or read on FreeRepublic. Quite the contrary, in fact, for a good 85% of what I've seen on this site.
...including your comments here.
Comment #69 Removed by Moderator
To: weegee
Ah, this is true.....;-)
70
posted on
01/11/2002 10:40:26 AM PST
by
DJ88
To: horsewhispersc
Ok, I'm gonna pretend I'm Donald Rumsfeld:
"Lay may never have dicussed the financial status of Enron but I'm certain Cheney did after each of the 6 meetings.Really? How are you certain? Who would he have discussed it with? Why? Has Enron been helped in any way since his discussions with Dick Cheney? Thank you. Next?
People are now saying the reason we don't see Cheney is because he's ducking a supoena (sp?), btw, I just heard a company lost 400,000,000 in their retirement account because of Enron. What people? Do you have the names of these "people" or is it just "people" you know? What COMPANY? Did President Bush or Vice-President Cheney encourage them in any way to invest in Enron?
When you come back with the answers to those questions, I'll be more than happy to help you.
71
posted on
01/11/2002 10:46:27 AM PST
by
DJ88
To: DJ88
Excellent reply, DJ. You have obviously attended one of the Rumsfeld seminars. Good show!
To: codebreaker
i'm troy mc clure! you might remember me from such films as:
'dig your own grave, and save'!
To: tangerine
It sounds as if you and those on whose behalf you're purporting to speak are awfully thin-skinned. Furthermore, you provide no evidence to substantiate that FreeRepublic presents
"unlimited knee-jerk insults to [your Democrat-voting friends], their family, faith and friends". The only thing unlimited about any of our written dialog here is your slander.
HF
74
posted on
01/11/2002 11:45:18 AM PST
by
holden
To: codebreaker
I think the mainstream media might be forced to give the Hillary Vote Scam story time because of the fact that she is a sitting NY Senator and Presidential candidate for 2004.Possibly, but if they do the stories will have a "the Hillary-haters are at it again" tenor. Just like when their man-god Bill was president.
75
posted on
01/11/2002 1:54:40 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: codebreaker
bump
76
posted on
01/11/2002 8:13:08 PM PST
by
GOPJ
To: codebreaker
bump
77
posted on
01/11/2002 8:13:24 PM PST
by
GOPJ
To: cousair
Hmmmmmmmm
"The Enron thing leads right back to the Clintons and other Demorats who were big on the "take money" list. Just because money was given in BOTH campaigns, doesn't mean with pointing fingers that anything is ...."
78
posted on
01/11/2002 8:15:53 PM PST
by
GOPJ
To: VRWC_minion
Good point:
This provides a lightning rod for the liberals who hate Bush. They are going to get themselves all worked about this and expend there energy chasing the proverbial holy grail "impeachment".
79
posted on
01/11/2002 8:16:38 PM PST
by
GOPJ
To: jackbill
The plot sickens:
Fox News reported last night on her PAC, which has collected about a million dollars. One quarter of that has been given to other DemocRATs. Three quarters of it (about $750,000) has been used for "administration". Sounds like a Jesse Jackson operation.
80
posted on
01/11/2002 8:17:28 PM PST
by
GOPJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson