Skip to comments.
Arms Seizure Backfires, Wounds Israel
STRATFOR ^
| 2120 GMT, 020108
| Staff
Posted on 01/08/2002 2:45:27 PM PST by Axion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: timestax
W.T.F. are u talking about?! The "flippin" captain of the ship even admits it was arms destined for arafats' ladsI think Stratfor is trying to say that the captain was an Israeli agent.
21
posted on
01/08/2002 3:02:28 PM PST
by
mvonfr
To: Lent
Could it be, that STRATFOR is doing analysis for the world, on the other side of the looking glass? How else could they be so symmetrically and uniformly wrong?
To: Axion
All I can say is where's the beef?
23
posted on
01/08/2002 3:05:44 PM PST
by
yikes
To: Axion
Horsecrap. Fox News carried an interview with the CAPTAIN OF THE SHIP...I believe he ADMITTED the weapons were bound for Arafat and his buddies, AND didn't he also say they came from IRAN??
To: habs4ever
It's amazing though. Their articles always sound so logical and well-written, but their batting average is so bad it's laughable.
25
posted on
01/08/2002 3:09:14 PM PST
by
Ronin
To: jerrymdss
"and now Arafat is promising to punish those responsible..."
Pretty damn pathetic for Stratfor when Arafat himself refutes their claims.
26
posted on
01/08/2002 3:12:21 PM PST
by
Ken H
To: a_witness
Have you ever read a more incompetent analysis than this ? Could it ? have been ? Nah, that would be too rich. Did Pat Buchanan write this ? Granted this article is trash (the reasons cited are very weak, at best), but why take a swipe at Pat? His stands on middleast issues are very reasoned, logical and nationalist.
27
posted on
01/08/2002 3:13:52 PM PST
by
sam
To: spqrzilla9
This is a rather bizarre article.Not bizarre at all for Stratfor. Par for the course tripe, and not worth the electrons to respond.
To: tet68; Thinkin' Gal; Orual; aculeus; Poohbah
Had the Israelis seized twice as many weapons, they'd have been twice as badly wounded.
I'm practicing to be a red-hot STRATFOR analyst. How'd I do?
29
posted on
01/08/2002 3:25:33 PM PST
by
dighton
To: Axion
Even the Clinton spin masters would look in awe of this one.
30
posted on
01/08/2002 3:25:49 PM PST
by
Pete53
To: dighton
Quite well! The Israelies cannot survive another faked incident,like the pizza parlour or disco bombing.Arafat denies those too.And we all know Arafat is an honorabe man. (/sarcasm)
31
posted on
01/08/2002 3:31:03 PM PST
by
tet68
To: dighton
STRATFOR used to know what they were talking about. Did they subcontract out to DEBKA recently?
32
posted on
01/08/2002 3:31:17 PM PST
by
Poohbah
To: dighton; aculeus
I'm practicing to be a red-hot STRATFOR analyst. How'd I do? You are individually intelligent so I guess you'll fit right in. You done good.
33
posted on
01/08/2002 3:32:52 PM PST
by
Orual
To: sam
Granted this article is trash (the reasons cited are very weak, at best), but why take a swipe at Pat? His stands on middleast issues are very reasoned, logical and nationalist.He would manage to get us in WWIII and lose it. The only sense I heard from him was when he said he would forgo politics and return to journalism because the American people had spoken (ie., rejected him). No, his stands on Middle East issues, not to mention WWII, are not reasoned, logical, and nationalist, unless of course you mean national socialist. He ran a close race with Ralph Nader as the most dangerous candidate for America. the both won.
To: dighton
Had the Israelis seized twice as many weapons, they'd have been twice as badly wounded. I'm practicing to be a red-hot STRATFOR analyst. How'd I do?LOL
Why does this remind me of the Black Knight in Monty Python ?
To: Poohbah
STRATFOR used to know what they were talking about. Did they subcontract out to DEBKA recently?Debka's posts on the subject make full sense, and raise some interesting questions about the Egyptian role. You may want to take a look.
36
posted on
01/08/2002 3:41:04 PM PST
by
mvonfr
To: mvonfr
That's what gets me. Normally, STRATFOR is the authoritative one, and DEBKA is the fruitcake brigade--now it's just the opposite.
37
posted on
01/08/2002 3:42:47 PM PST
by
Poohbah
To: Axion
The presence of Palestinian naval officers aboardthe vessel, including one who later directly fingeredtwo of Arafat's top lieutenants, limits plausible deniability.But has no effect on Stratfor's insanity.
One also ponders the size of the Palestinian
Navy.
38
posted on
01/08/2002 3:44:09 PM PST
by
gcruse
To: gcruse
C'mon, the Palestinian Navy does six-month deployments in the Dead Sea with their ZBGs (Zodiac Battlegroups).
39
posted on
01/08/2002 3:46:52 PM PST
by
Poohbah
To: Axion
It would be either extremely stupid or sheerly lunatic for the Palestinians to think that a weapons-laden ship might transit the Red Sea and the Suez Canal undetected at a time when both are under heightened surveillance. Yeah those brilliant Palestians couldn't be behind this.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson