Posted on 01/07/2002 9:36:18 AM PST by Notwithstanding
The chapters include The White Man's World, The Brown Man's World, The Black Man's World, the Red Man's World and the Yellow Man's World. His recommendation was the extermination of all but the Nordic portion of the White Man's world and a handful of racial "inferiors" to serve as servants and slaves to the ubermenschen. Also, for those who think that it was just Rockefeller Republicans who were enthusiastic for PP's agenda, bear in mind that Barry Goldwater's first wife, Peggy, was a member of PP's national board of directors from 1941 or so to her death in the mid-1970s.
Slicing and dicing sentient babies and turning them into a one or two pound bundle of bleeding chopped meat is what PP has always been about. If they were honest, their name would be Premeditated Infanticide.
"The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy," by Lothrop Stoddard, A.M., Ph.D. (Harvard)
Because we live in a socialist country
WOW. Whatever you do, don't let us wonder, prove it for the world to see. (the sarcasm impaired my need translation help here)
I don't think health care is an area where we can experiment for religious and political reasons.
Mark Bertler, executive director of the Michigan Association for Local Public Health, wrote in August 2001 to the chairman of the House committee considering the bill. He wrote that his board, representing public health departments across the state, opposed it.
"The board is concerned that this legislation may put Michigan's successful family planning and pregnancy prevention programs at risk.
Seems to me that if a woman can give birth, in all probability she is in very good 'reproductive health'.
Orwell saw them coming a loooong time ago.
Maybe killing the woman after such an encounter would present no problems to you either. Pregnancy avoided.
So the sins of the past live on? Is that what you're saying? Gee, you must be 100% behind reparations for victims of slavery. Maybe PP's "victims" should get reparations too?
...or more accurately, perhaps abortion should be viewed today the same way that slavery is. Morally wrong.
I don't particularly care who founded PP or why. As well as I can determine TODAY, they appear to be serving the public interest.
Your word isn't law. Back up your assertation.
So, to you, the words "family planning" means abortions only? You think that folks don't go to PP with fertility problems? You think PP does not provide educational services, pre-natal care, or a host of other services that have nothing to do with abortion? Or is it that you just can't see past the abortion part? (Now it's YOUR turn to be "honest.")
A rational person would no more turn to PP for these sort of things anymore than they would turn to Hillary Clinton for a healthcare plan.
....and I certainly have no interest in engaging in a moral debate about abortion.
I wouldn't try, either.
Go ahead… have the baby… and if you don't want it… give it to a gay couple to adopt. There, that will spare us thousands of abortions per year.
(laughing)
You could start with the link in post 18. You could even (gasp!) try to think, "If someone openly supports promotic the eugenic betterment of the healthy white race, then I ought to be able to go to my favorite search engine and verify it for myself." Like:
http://www.google.com/search?q=rockefeller+eugenics.
Or http://www.google.com/search?q=bush+eugenics.
Or http://www.google.com/search?q=carnegie+eugenics.
Or http://www.google.com/search?q=harriman+eugenics.
I like a good conspiracy theory. Here's my favorite: some bogeyman is making the American aristocracy say and do things that they really don't mean.
Pro-choice Planned Parenthood will also likely end up spending nearly $18 million on Al Gore’s behalf this election year, directing persuasion phone calls and mailings to more than 2 million “compassionate conservative” women the group identified in surveys earlier this year. Additionally, Planned Parenthood ran $8 million worth of T.V. ads in nine key battleground states.
Let's have more money from government "slush funds" (otherwise known as 'tax surpluses'), from which the Democrats in turn funnel to their pet groups to attack opposition candidates.
Yes, he did.
Great point.
This is only the tip of the iceberg........organizations masquerading under the guise of "public health providers" or "educational institutions" who are nothing but taxpayer funded attack dogs for the DNC.
Garbage. Every doctor is a public health organization, that does not make them eligible for government funds however. The degenerate murderers at Planned Parenthood however constantly break the law by calling just about every abortion they do "to save the life of the mother" when those creeps would not know more about the woman than that she is pregnant. These people are not just murderers but also constantly flout the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.