Skip to comments.
Behind India's War Hysteria: Domestic Scandal (my title)
Christianity Today ^
| March 19, 2001
| Anto Akkara
Posted on 12/30/2001 7:22:13 PM PST by Justin Raimondo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: sinkspur
Haha Dittos! This atheist clown Raimundo is now a defender of the (Muslim) faith!
21
posted on
12/31/2001 4:24:38 PM PST
by
dennisw
Question: Has FR become so influential that "sides" are hiring people to post and comment their particular spin?
To: Justin Raimondo
"No Truce," you have no clue. I have no clue? I do not believe I am the one singing the praises of a third-world thug, a dictator who overthrew the elected government of a country, and is only on our side because he was given a choice between a lead bullet and a gold coin. I am not the one who believes that "elections do not a free country make," to justify support for a dictator (certainly as Orwellian a position as I have seen on this board in a long time).
Elections may not a free country make, but it seems to me a necessary, if not sufficient condition. Hitler and Milosevic were initially elected, but as with Musharraf, abused the powers they had to pervert and overthrow representative governments. It seems to strange that someone who claims to be a libertarian spokesman finds so many good words for a thug who spits on the principals of libertarianism. So give me a clue oh great one. How do you square Musharraf with libertarianism?
To: No Truce With Kings
What about Pinochet? In a crisis, where the choice is between an elected tyranny and a military coup, the best choice is -- what? Pakistani libertarians, I would say, have a loooong road ahead of them, but a military leader who seizes power can, as in Chile, pave the way for a free market economy. Pinochet saved Chile from Communism. Musharraf, under somewhat different circumstances -- and, no doubt, with covert US support -- saved Pakistan from sliding into chaos or, perhaps, falling under the rule of a Taliban-type regime. It seems particularly wrong for the US to pull the rug out from under him and side with the odious government of India when he supported the US war effort all the way. The aim of this manuever is to isolate America compeltely from its Muslim allies and destroy the coalition -- and I can hardly believe that I, an opponent of this war, have to point this out to you, presumably one of the "let's roll" crowd.
I trust that answers your concerns.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson