Skip to comments.
Addicted to the Drug War
Ludwig von Mises Institute ^
| December 28, 2001
| Ilana Mercer
Posted on 12/30/2001 1:25:13 AM PST by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980 ... 2,121-2,137 next last
To: Cultural Jihad
You really ought to consider removing the "born again Christian" label in your profile page if you're going to denigrate that religion with your behavior. That was a DISPICABLE comment Sir.
To: Cultural Jihad
What's libellous about that? You MUST be delusional if you think you have a right NOT to be made unhappy by others. So if you are NOT seeing a doctor and taking meds for your condition, you SHOULD BE!
942
posted on
01/01/2002 3:18:35 PM PST
by
dcwusmc
To: clamper1797
Unless I am mistaken, Libertarians do not support a "standing army"
943
posted on
01/01/2002 3:18:55 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
To: Cultural Jihad
The right to manufacture, sell, and comsume is a legitimate right, because in doing so, I am neither bothering or asking anything of anyone else.
Your supposed "right" to destroy yourself infringes on my right to pursue happiness, being sad at having to sit by and watch people needlessly suffer and die.
RTFLMAO!!!!!!
Then don't watch. But you have no problem watching Jack-booted thugs making docile drug users suffer and some even die under their Jack-booted power of the State.
944
posted on
01/01/2002 3:19:11 PM PST
by
Zon
To: Jhoffa_
how so Don H?
In a Libertarian society am I not free to do with my belongings as I wish?
No, you are quite obviously not. If you wish further attention from me on this subject, than acknowledge that I just explained this, in some manner.
945
posted on
01/01/2002 3:20:27 PM PST
by
donh
To: tpaine
What IS your problem bunky..
Actually, TPaine.. I have none..
And you are one of my favorite Libertarians.. Incredibly enough..
However, if you want to ride your ideology completely out... It becomes destructive..
It becomes immoral. And I oppose it.
946
posted on
01/01/2002 3:21:49 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
To: Jhoffa_
This one does .... Of course I'm about 60% Libertarian and 40% conservative. I'm VERY anti WOD but I'm VERY pro military and 2nd amendment ... also VERY anti-illegal immigration and somewhat anti-abortion
To: donh; OWK
No, you are quite obviously not.
So, I am not free to do with my property as I wish?
Yes?
948
posted on
01/01/2002 3:23:51 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
To: clamper1797
Then there is hope for you my son..
:)
949
posted on
01/01/2002 3:25:02 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
To: Jhoffa_
Unless I am mistaken, Libertarians do not support a "standing army" In that they support the Constitution as it was written, and the Consitution is quite clear on this subject, indeed they do.
950
posted on
01/01/2002 3:25:04 PM PST
by
donh
To: clamper1797
I think SAINT GERMAINE should give our boy:
A LESSON IN HUMILITY AND MEEKNESS
951
posted on
01/01/2002 3:25:21 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: Jhoffa_
I'm still waiting for you to answer the question I asked on the national ID thread. I posted it again at post
#57. This time please answer the question instead of giving an alternative.
952
posted on
01/01/2002 3:26:27 PM PST
by
Zon
To: Jhoffa_
If we can get you to re-examine your stance on the WOsD ... there might be hope for you too...
To: Zon
Sorry
southern rock, I forgot to flag you in post #944. It's a response to CJ's truly laughable response to you.
954
posted on
01/01/2002 3:31:20 PM PST
by
Zon
To: Jhoffa_
Your '20%' slip is showing.
You sound exactly like every other pitiful little libertarian baiting clown on this forum. The standard spiel is boorre-ing. Say something new, or be smart enough to shut up.
955
posted on
01/01/2002 3:33:00 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: Jhoffa_
So, I am not free to do with my property as I wish? Yes?
Yes. what did I say in post #893? Do you ever plan to follow up on an argument, or are you going to be the same kind of shallow, disconnected drivel-spewer roscoe is?
956
posted on
01/01/2002 3:34:08 PM PST
by
donh
To: donh
"...are you going to be the same kind of shallow, disconnected drivel-spewer..."
Mais, non!!
Authoritarians of all stripes are striving to acquire the ALL-NEW Mark II Drivel-Spewer, guaranteed not to bog down in the thicker patches. ;^)
To: donh
what did I say in post #893?In regard to initiation of force, fraud and coercion used against a person, I offer this... The ultimate purpose of the jury is to decide if harm has been done to the person claiming to be a victim and to what extent the person has been harmed. All jurors will be informed that they have the option of jury nullification. Objective law; The Point Law nullifies agenda law and ego law.
958
posted on
01/01/2002 3:39:39 PM PST
by
Zon
To: headsonpikes
Authoritarians of all stripes are striving to acquire the ALL-NEW Mark II Drivel-Spewer, guaranteed not to bog down in the thicker patches. ;^)Not all. Some prefer to fire off small snippets of drivel (aka Drivel Mc Nuggets) from a distance. The weapon of choice for them is a heavy barelled dolt action drivel gun.
To: headsonpikes
Authoritarians of all stripes are striving to acquire the ALL-NEW Mark II Drivel-Spewer, guaranteed not to bog down in the thicker patches. ;^)Yes, but it was tpaine and tacticalogic that gave us Dolt and Drivel McNuggets on this long thread. To which I added...
Drivel McNuggets for Dolts!
Could be a campaign slogan for the integrity impaired.
960
posted on
01/01/2002 3:46:27 PM PST
by
Zon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980 ... 2,121-2,137 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson