Posted on 12/29/2001 12:09:10 AM PST by DNA Rules
Picture is below article.
Yet the murderers still use euphemisms like "a woman's reproductive choice" to disguise this horror.
A woman already does have the "choice" to become pregnant or not to become pregnant.
Once the child is conceived it becomes a matter of murder to prevent it's birth.
this clearly indicates viability of the fetus...
not only viability but a natural tendency toward living and surviving...
you are playing right into pro-choice hands...
blaming President Bush will not solve anything...
if you do blame him we are split and divided and we lose this isuue as they hope we do!
We cannot be viewed as extremists here...
God gave us a tough job to do, and we must do it in a civilized manner...
We must have faith that we will eventually win the hearts and minds of those who consider abortion as an alternative...
This picture exposes abortion for what it really is - the taking of an innocent life...
You and I know this...
but this is not just a war against aborting innocent babies, it is a war against a press that is saturated with bias towards this issue and we must act accordingly...
President Bush and others are doing the best they can to bring this issue under control and expose this issue to the American public and the world...
We will win this... Please have faith...
3,000 innocents are killed by terrorists in NY and we go to WAR!!!
1,000,000 + innocents are murdered at the hands of "DOCTORS?" and baby parts are SOLD and we ( America ) turn our heads.
God Bless America ???
The website above should be REQUIRED, reading and watching, for anyone even considering an abortion!!!!!!!
Pray that Almighty GOD will open our eyes,,,,,,,
But bear in mind the atomic bomb was a product of Nazi research... should Truman have turned down the technology on the basis that it was the product of a mass-murdering regime? Should Truman have then opted to invade Japan rather than drop the bombs? Should we tear up our interstate highways because Hitler was the guy behind the idea of an autobahn, and Eisenhower admired the idea if not the man?
Should we eliminate the use of medical research that had its roots in WW2 Nazi experiments? If so, are you sure you have never benefitted from such research? After all, many have already, even unknowingly. Should the research simply be forgotten or shredded, because its origins were vile, even though innocent people are benefitting from it?
Assume for a moment that you are some cave man and some guys are about to kill your entire family, and all you have to stop them is a femur bone left over from a child murdered by thugs years before. Is it OK for you to pick up the bone and use it as a club? Must you stand by your ethics and refuse the weapon, trying to defend your family with your bare hands instead?
Should we then return our land to the Indians, or return to our roots overseas, because much of our land was stolen from the Indians?
Should we destroy historic plantation houses or require they be left to rot away because so many were built by slaves?
Should we throw away children who are the product of rape?
Is it immoral to live in a house where someone was murdered by criminals, or shall the property remain forever as it was on the day the owner died?
Is it truly ethical to throw away anything useful, whatever its origins?
I think not.
Granted, what should NOT be permitted is for those who conducted research on aborted human life illegally to profit from it. Their research should be turned over to others who followed the law. But to throw the research and material away is a shame and it will not bring anyone back to life, nor end the practice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.