Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

**Bush invokes executive privilege to keep Justice Department documents secret**
AP ^ | 12-13-01 | John Solomon

Posted on 12/13/2001 6:02:13 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:39:12 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-389 next last
To: SUSSA
"You are missing the point of the investigation. We already know that crimes were committed in both the Clinton/Gore fund-raising scandal and in the Boston case. There is more than ample evidence to prove crimes were committed in both cases. We also know that nobody was prosecuted for these crimes. We do not know why nobody was prosecuted. "

That's funny. Congress hasn't said any crimes were committed by Clinton/Gore. If Congress already has all the evidence and just wants to know why they weren't prosecuted, why doesn't Congress go ahead and pass a resolution saying that Clinton/Gore should be prosecuted?

You Bush-haters have the mentality of two year olds.

341 posted on 12/13/2001 10:11:50 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Meet the new boss".
342 posted on 12/13/2001 10:24:15 PM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Congress hasn't said any crimes were committed by Clinton/Gore. If Congress already has all the evidence and just wants to know why they weren't prosecuted, why doesn't Congress go ahead and pass a resolution saying that Clinton/Gore should be prosecuted?

This is an amazing post. You must be the only person on Free Republic who is unaware of the Clinton/Gore crimes. Take your medication and maybe your memory will return.

343 posted on 12/13/2001 10:24:43 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
Please provide a link to where Congress, or a committee thereof has voted that Clinton/Gore committed crimes. Until Congress first goes on record as saying that Clinton/Gore committeed crimes, they have no need to question why the DoJ decided not to prosecute them.

Congress will not make public thier own internal memos and papers concerning their decisions not to vote resolutions saying Clinton/Gore committed crimes, why should they want to make public the executive branch ones?

You Bush-haters have the mentality of two-year-olds.

344 posted on 12/13/2001 10:36:11 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Congress is not a grand jury. They do not take a vote on crimes. They lay out the facts and report their findings. Their last report listed loads of evidence. They have a memo with Gore's note in his own hand writing saying he was going to a fund-raiser at that Buddhist temple. They have both still and video pictures of him at the fund-raiser. Where did he think he was, at a toga party?

You clintonistas can't face the fact that your boys got caught.

345 posted on 12/13/2001 10:53:30 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
I'm still waiting for you to show me where Congress has voted that Clinton/Gore should be prosecuted. Until then, they have no right to questionthe decision making process of the DoJ. Burton id just grandstanding.

It must be painful for you Bush-haters to see your numbers shrinking on FR as more people began to recognize what a great President George W. Bush is. I feel your pain and love it.

346 posted on 12/13/2001 10:59:41 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
You Bush-haters have the mentality of two-year-olds.

They are just Clintonistas that are acting out their stereotypical images of what a "conservative" sounds like. They are out in all their glory for some "payback".

347 posted on 12/13/2001 11:04:32 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Don't try to hide it. The only people who won't admit that Clinton/Gore committed crimes are clintonistas. You clintonistas can't face the fact that your boys got caught. Take your medication, go back to democrats.com and tell your friends that you were outed on FR.
348 posted on 12/13/2001 11:06:30 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
Dan Burton has seen all the same evidence as the DoJ. Just show me one statement by Burton that in his opinion Clinton/Gore should be prosecuted. Until he is willing to lay it on the line he has no right to question why the DoJ didn't prosecute.

Burton and his committee have been a great disappointment. Why aren't they investigating and impeaching corrupt judges appointed by Clinton? He's nothing but a publicity hound.

349 posted on 12/13/2001 11:35:08 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Your DNC mantra is wearing thin. "Clinton wasn't convicted and Gore wasn't charged so no crimes were committed." Keep telling your self that when your medication kicks in you might feel better.
350 posted on 12/13/2001 11:44:53 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

Comment #351 Removed by Moderator

To: mancini
this must be real important for him to address it while there are so many other pressing matters to attend to. Don't you think?

timing is everything. burton's bulldogs must have been getting too close...again.

352 posted on 12/14/2001 3:02:50 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mancini; rdavis84; LSJohn
remember the old saying: "where there's smoke, there's bush. where there's bush, there's bubba."
353 posted on 12/14/2001 3:04:47 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: thinden
"remember the old saying: "where there's smoke, there's bush. where there's bush, there's bubba."

Joined at the nostrils?

Or just sharing a line?

354 posted on 12/14/2001 3:21:25 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84; LSJohn
Joined at the nostrils?

Or just sharing a line?

both?

p.s. could it also be "where there's bush, there's...hildabeast"??????

355 posted on 12/14/2001 4:11:49 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bump

For later reading

356 posted on 12/14/2001 4:29:08 AM PST by DreamWeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinden
"p.s. could it also be "where there's bush, there's...hildabeast"??????"

With Vince you've got a threesome.

357 posted on 12/14/2001 4:32:53 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Thank-you Uncle Bill. It's a goldmine.
358 posted on 12/14/2001 5:02:51 AM PST by KirkandBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
whooooa, lol..... the good ole boys, the bubba/bush connection. Has a good ring don't ya think. ;-)
359 posted on 12/14/2001 5:11:59 AM PST by horsewhispersc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

Comment #360 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-389 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson