Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruling: Excite@Home network must shut down at midnight
DotCom Scoop ^ | Nov. 30, 2001

Posted on 11/30/2001 1:22:42 PM PST by John Jorsett

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last
To: meyer
A new term: BUSINESS TERRORISM

BUSINESS TERRORISM is when you can Chapter 11 a company, screw the stockholders, buy the infrastructure (network) assets for pennies on the dollar and then use those assets in a new company you have created to provide the same service. That is exactly what AT&T has done, but I think they have underestimated what can be swept under the rug. This fiasco will see the light of day.

What gets me is AT&T has 70% control of the Board of Directors of Excite@Home cable Internet and they have purposely run this company into the ground so they can start a fresh without the incestuous cable companies.

101 posted on 11/30/2001 11:31:28 PM PST by Willing To Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: isom35
Well, it's 0631 AM EST 12/1/20001 here on the gulf coast of Florida, where ComCast uses Excite as it's ISP, and all is still working. Cool!


102 posted on 12/01/2001 2:36:00 AM PST by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Willing To Listen
What gets me is AT&T has 70% control of the Board of Directors of Excite@Home cable Internet and they have purposely run this company into the ground so they can start a fresh without the incestuous cable companies.

If this is so, then the judge did us a favor by ruling that they could shut down. All parties know that a shutdown would instantly alienate 4 million or so customers unless something else could be brought in as an instant replacement. AT&T has a replacement, but I don't know if it is physically possible to bring it online quickly. But if they maneuvered to kill @home and brought in worldnet, word would be all over the media and that would hurt them.

A shutdown threat will bring about a more fair offer by AT&T. IMHO, of course. ATT hoped that they could get some infrastructure for pennies on the dollar, but now they'll have to negotiate more fairly. On the other hand, I hope that this doesn't give @home too much leverage. If it costs too much to buy the system, nobody will buy it.

At first, I didn't think that ATT was so skillful that they could pull off such a stunt. I hadn't realized that they had such a large stake in @home. Perhaps I was mistaken.

103 posted on 12/01/2001 3:54:11 AM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson