Skip to comments.
Gore edged ahead of Bush under all the scenarios for counting all undervotes and overvotes statewide
Drudge ^
| 11/11/2001
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 11/11/2001 3:00:48 PM PST by Sonar5
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-364 next last
To: Sonar5
They 'counted' non-votes... Whatever. Bush won, Gore lost. GET OVER IT ALL READY!
To: Sonar5
To: Sonar5
For the benefit of those who forgot all about this mess months ago, could someone review the definitions of an undervote and an overvote?
To: Sonar5
And the point is? Overvotes and Undervotes don't count. This is just the media playing the "we's were cheated card" for the demo's.
Well with the war on even Gore supports are glad that Bush is the President. So, I guess the point is to try to divide the Country in war time to help the terrorists out there.
24
posted on
11/11/2001 3:10:37 PM PST
by
Ironsman
To: Nakatu X
Yeah, they spent a year and untold $$$ counting DISQUALIFIED BALLOTS but conveniently forgot to count the military votes. We need to point out to anyone and everyone that disqualified ballots ARE NOT VOTES!
25
posted on
11/11/2001 3:11:16 PM PST
by
alnick
To: TomGuy
All those pregnant chads finally gave birth. LOL! The liberal media is only pro-life when it comes to "pregnant" chads.
26
posted on
11/11/2001 3:11:20 PM PST
by
Dane
To: Bubba_Leroy
How the fu*k can you count over-votes and under-votes? Do they not believe that people just don't decide to leave that blank? If someone votes twice for bush or gore then that vote is an overvote and does not count. How can that be added to the total?
To: Lexington Green
Uhmm....
Of course this would be great strategy for the RNC to use,
if they wanted to generate some serious backlash against
the DNC and left leaning media, ehhh?
(shhhhh, don't tell anyone)
28
posted on
11/11/2001 3:11:40 PM PST
by
Deep_6
To: toenail
We're not at war. Please spare us this nonsense.
To: veronica
Treasonous only becuase it's false, or treasonous even if it were true?
To: Sonar5
If true (and that's a big "if"), all this proves to me is that:
1. People who are too dumb and stupid to know how to vote properly are Dems
2. David Boies did a fine job
31
posted on
11/11/2001 3:12:02 PM PST
by
jporcus
To: Sonar5
This is great news! The Liberals should really be pissed off now. HAHAHAHA!!!!
To: Sonar5; Miss Marple; Irma; deport; Torie; Teacup; xsmommy
Well, when do they start counting all the undervotes and overvotes in the other 49 states?
It seems to me if they are going to go with this, they should do them ALL, right?
33
posted on
11/11/2001 3:12:15 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: toenail
With all respect I don't think the 5,000 American dead would agree with you on us not being at war.
34
posted on
11/11/2001 3:12:18 PM PST
by
Ironsman
To: Sonar5
Stand by for the Talking heads to be saying, "Told you so." So if every strategy involving changing election rules were taken into consideration, Gore won. But under current rules Bush won. Wow, the Media's brain activity is astounding. I bet if we changed election rules, Bush Sr. would have beat Clinton. God I hate them.
To: Sonar5
Well - gee, I wonder what the Today Show with perky Katie Couric will be all about tomorrow morning. I don't think I care to tune in to find out -but - what does it matter - I NEVER tune in to see what she and the rest of them are discussing.
I think I will definitely make it a point to STAY AWAY from the tv news shows for a week or so.
It will be interesting, to say the least---
36
posted on
11/11/2001 3:12:43 PM PST
by
MasonGal
To: Sonar5
**World Exclusive** **Must Credit DRUDGE REPORT**
A vote-by-vote review of untallied ballots in the 2000 Florida presidential election commissioned by the nation's main media outlets shows Al Gore edged ahead of George W. "under all the scenarios for counting all undervotes and overvotes statewide," the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
APCNNNYTWASHPOSTLATIMESNEWSDAYCHICAGOTRIB will splash on Monday an election review which will ignite total controversy, publishing sources told DRUDGE on Sunday.
MORE
LOLROF
37
posted on
11/11/2001 3:13:01 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: toenail
We're not at war. Only Congress can declare war, and they declined to do so. A rose by any other name ...
38
posted on
11/11/2001 3:13:12 PM PST
by
alnick
To: Libertarian_4_eva
How the fu*k can you count over-votes and under-votes? And count them only in one state out of 49?
39
posted on
11/11/2001 3:13:19 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Sonar5
Every "dimpled" chad was evidence of voter fraud. So sayeth the manufacturer of the Vote-A-Matic. No one was ever able to create a "dimpled" chad--because you had to put several ballots in the Vote-A-Matic to do it. So Gore wins for years he should serve in the penitentiary.
As noted above, the disenfranchisement of our overseas military personnel by teams of Gore lawyers using a five-page faxed memo is a testament to the execratory nature of the creature. He is not a man--a rat would be closer to it.
Counting all the fraud and all the shameful disenfranchisement, counting all the media spin that Gore won--with the peninsula polls still open--Bush won Florida and won it huge.
Matt Drudge, you are the donkey's excrement, the Dem's last, best hope.
Tonight your radio waves will go somewhere--but they're not welcome here.
Here, the American flags are displayed and illuminated all night long.
God Bless America and Hail to the Chief.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-364 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson