Skip to comments.
Media suppress the news that Bush lost election to Gore
Sydney Morning Herald ^
| October 22, 2001
| Charles Laurence
Posted on 10/21/2001 6:06:48 PM PDT by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-115 next last
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Oh, sorry! :)
81
posted on
10/21/2001 9:11:29 PM PDT
by
summer
To: John Jorsett
Newspapers were saying last week that the final phase of the analysis, counting the 170,000 votes, had been postponed. They haven't even counted them, their final phase of this analysis but they can say that gore won by a wide margin?
The votes were illegal and/or have been changed since the election and the previous multiple recounts.
These people serve no purpose but to intentionally cause harm to our legal and legitimate President.
Let's send these nuts to afghanistan.
82
posted on
10/21/2001 9:13:22 PM PDT
by
chantal7
To: summer
"Oh, sorry! :)"
sorry you got caught in my rant
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
No problem. It's not the worst that has happened to me! :)
84
posted on
10/21/2001 9:18:09 PM PDT
by
summer
To: John Jorsett
This isn't just water under the bridge - this is GARBAGE!! In the first place, what they are counting is the over-votes, under votes, etc. These are ILLEGAL votes - and they don't count!!! H e l l o!!! If the media wants to count them, let them - THEY DON'T COUNT!!!!!!!! The media is still so upset because their cheating didn't win the election - they are CONTINUING TO CHEAT - give me a break!!
85
posted on
10/21/2001 9:18:45 PM PDT
by
Sueann
To: John Jorsett
Loose chads reveal ABSTAIN votes: 1. voters who changed their minds while voting, or 2. patriots, who for the first time in their lives refused to vote for a democrat for President.
To: John Jorsett
Since when did choosing a president fall to the media anyhow? They are legends in their own minds!
To: John Jorsett
It took Carnac 8 months to hold the ballots up to his head and say, "what is a Gore vote?". The answer was "An idiot tried to vote but couldn't punch the card correctly".
Comment #89 Removed by Moderator
To: John Jorsett
still counting spoiled ballots. don't they know what spoiled means. I have a feeling they spoiled more Bush votes than Gores in a very selective process. There must be a way to expose these creeps.
90
posted on
10/21/2001 9:31:39 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: John Jorsett
still counting spoiled ballots. don't they know what spoiled means. I have a feeling they spoiled more Bush votes than Gores in a very selective process. There must be a way to expose these creeps.
91
posted on
10/21/2001 9:32:21 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: John Jorsett
Results of the inspection of more than 170,000 votes rejected as unreadable in the "hanging chad" chaos of last November's vote count were ready at the end of August.These people continue to conveniently forget that these are BALLOTS, not votes. Had the chad actually been punched out correctly, it would have been a legal vote. By law, they don't count. Hand count all you want, let the chads fall where they may (or be pulled off as you so choose) but it wont change the fact that they are not votes...they are ballots. And W WON, and won, and won....
92
posted on
10/21/2001 9:46:52 PM PDT
by
No Fool
To: summer
"It's not the worst that has happened to me"
always be prepared!
asbestos and tin foil, LOL
To: cajungirl
"Wanta bet if there were an election tomorrow the margin by which Pres. Bush would whip both al gore and Bill Clinton. These people are so irrelevant, they are blowing in the wind."Ping!
Like the way you think, babe.
94
posted on
10/21/2001 9:55:51 PM PDT
by
Firebeer
To: John Jorsett
What this author is doing, is using the Urban Legend methodology, to support his own prefference. You know the trick, " a friend of a close personal friend, whose Aunt works for the man who... ", and the other old, reliable, " Someone who REALLY knows, told the dog groomer's grandfather's mistress , who told my mailman...". Beides, so many of the discounted ballots, which were later counted, were doctored in the counting . No one, after all of the manhandling, could be certain how to count the votes by now.
To: sweetliberty
"Since when did choosing a president fall to the media anyhow?"
To: hoot2
I think that it also means that NIXON WON , in '60, that is.
To: John Jorsett
No, the media is covering up evidence they discovered of massive Democrat election fraud.
Comment #99 Removed by Moderator
To: John Jorsett; summer; KQQL; JBonvillain; Common Tator; Slyfox; AmishDude; otterpond; Ole Okie...
I'd like to point out to everyone that I posted this same story
here earlier today, and in that post I also showed how the
Sydney Morning Herald intentionally deleted key paragraphs of the original story from the UK
Telegraph in order to falsely make the story appear to be conclusive proof of Gore's "victory" when in fact it was no such thing.
They rewrote the article to make it lie! The ultimate in liberal media bias!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson