Posted on 07/23/2007 7:58:41 AM PDT by George W. Bush
“Ron Paul is no Ronald Reagan.”
He is a HELL of a lot closer than Bush or any of the idiots currently running.
alleging 400 people with most apparently from out of state.
(of course the number is padded) and of course they used the trick of using a smaller room to make it look “full”.
Nader gets the same kook fringe crowds and hardly any more viable. Kucinich gets the same crowds just to see his wife’s toung piercing... (ok a little sarcasm on the last one)
Ron Paul is just like all the other stuck-in-the-single-digiters, going nowhere fast and meaningless to the overall debate.
Oooooh, wow. 16 standing ovations!!!!! Obviously RP is qualified to be POTUS based on his ability (and those of his campaign) to put on a media event where all those who attended were invited and all those who are against RP not allowed to participate (the usually way these events are staged for the media).
It is like the old game show “to tell the truth”,
Each candidate says “I am Ronald Reagan” and we have to figure out which ones are lying in a field where ALL the declared candidates are obviously lying.
Nah, Reagan wasn't a cupcake who would have turned a blind eye to the threat of Islamicism. Ron is no where near being like Reagan.
You might be right. However, given what President Reagan's response to Libya was following the Pan Am bombing, I'd guess that President Reagan would have engaged this current enemy in much the same way as what we've done after 9/11/01.
I concur!
Yes. We do. And the threat was communism. And he was not afraid to challenge them.
General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!
I suppose Reagan was a globalist too?
Good words yes, but words from 20 plus years ago.
A lot has changed since then.
Insult those who don't agree with you--now there's a charitable and winning message.
Signed,
Just another idiot with a low IQ
Anyone can post his speech. He doesn’t copyright them.
He didn’t want to vote on the crap being proposed and passed by Congress, which above all gives credence to the UN and cedes more of our sovereignty, below that it gives power to the president usually reserved by congress and allows for for the politicization of the ‘war’ for elections if the war goes badly. I don’t doubt he would have voted against his own declaration of war against Iraq if it came to a vote.
It is true he didn’t want war but I feel his principles dictated to him that he proposes a Declaration of Wars a constitutional alternative to what was being passed. Congress ignored this. Said ‘Declarations of Wars are archaic’ and not needed anymore. (which is similar argument they use with most of the Constitution, especially with the 2nd amendment). Instead we got what we got.
In the world where normal people with MORE than two brain cells (and therefore not "paleos") live, isolationists are a minor and irrelevant nuisance and the struggle is between the "internationalist" types aka liberals who want to ask "Mother May I?" to the UN before each breath and those Americans who are conservative in foreign policy, want no part of the UN or other internationalist institutions, are American nationalists, patriots, interventionists (on our terms alone) and support a manly American sovereignty exercised whenever necessary or desirable against America's enemies.
Your posting here illustrates your complicit attitude. How can you claim otherwise?
No, Ronald Reagan was the real thing. PaleoPaulie and his love slaves are phony”cons” and never more so than when they desecrate Ronald Reagan’s memory by suggesting that he would have any tolerance whatsoever for the collective cowardice of paleoPaulie and the paleos and Paulistinians.
Q: Which U.S. Congressman was the author and lead sponsor of H.R. 1146, "The American Sovreignty Restoration act"? (Bill to END U.S. funding of the United Nations.)
Get back at me when you find the answer.
So once again, why don't they fear us? Could it be because we're not sewing terrorists into pigskin sacks, sinking them to the bottom of the sea, and posting the video on YouTube?
to go a little further, which president wants to continue to dismantle our sovereignty by signing the north american union which does not need congress approval?
clue, same president that told the american people he would sign the amnesty bill in the rose garden.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.