Skip to comments.
Libertarian Party: Campaign Finance Reform Ruling is Assault on Free Speech
Libertarian Party press release ^
| December 11, 2003
| George Getz
Posted on 12/11/2003 6:38:18 PM PST by Commie Basher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181 next last
To: SUSSA
Well, perhaps people will tire of arm twisting. We'll see.
101
posted on
12/12/2003 2:23:36 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(All your ZOT are belong to us.)
To: The_Eaglet
How many members you got signed up now?
102
posted on
12/12/2003 2:25:21 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(All your ZOT are belong to us.)
To: John R. (Bob) Locke
I can't deal in "if's" --- it happened. It's called politics.
Remember, McCain and his democrat buddies controlled the Senate and they were blocking every piece of legislation or adding their CFR to every bill?
McCain was making good on his lofty promise to "his" voters and POTUS needed McCain. The Senate was 50-50 (with VP Cheneny expected to break many ties) then I think either Paul Coverdale from GA died and a dem was appointed, or Jefford's jumped sides. Either way, McCain got his way with a watered-down CFR.
Therefore, the number of SCOTUS Lefties MATTERED!
I do not want a democrat president appointing Day-O'Connor's successor, nor Stevens' nor Renhnquist's. Therefore I will vote a straight GOP ticket as I always have. To vote otherwise, is to only assist in the election of a democrat, and that is damn dangerous and flat-out foolish. In fact, I'll call that voting, anti-military and un-American.
103
posted on
12/12/2003 2:25:32 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: John R. (Bob) Locke
Well, I hope you are wrong. But even if you've nailed 2008 perfectly, I see no reason to throw in the towel early.
Vote out as many RATS as humanly possible in 2004!!
104
posted on
12/12/2003 2:27:40 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(All your ZOT are belong to us.)
To: Jim Robinson
You have more faith in them than I do.
105
posted on
12/12/2003 2:30:55 AM PST
by
SUSSA
To: Jim Robinson
How many members you got signed up now? LOL.
None in the past couple of years. I wish I could be more involved in the political process in general although I try to do what I can.
To: The_Eaglet
Your CP will only serve to help elect democrats, which makes yall no better than democrats and there is nothing further to discuss.
I will pray Ralph Nader's party cancels yours and then some. It's likely they will, thank God.
107
posted on
12/12/2003 2:33:24 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: John R. (Bob) Locke
You mean besides promoting the killing of millions of unborn babies and flaunting homosexualism in our faces while enacting their perverted agenda and cutting God out of public view while attempting to ram same-sex marriage down our throats and attempting to take our guns and at the same time giving away our national sovereignty? Just a whole bunch of minor stuff like that.
108
posted on
12/12/2003 2:33:44 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(All your ZOT are belong to us.)
To: onyx
Your CP will only serve to help elect democrats, which makes yall no better than democrats and there is nothing further to discuss. Since some Constitution Party members have won some local races (partisan and non-partisan), that's not necessarily the case.
To: Jim Robinson
There's always been more voters on the looney Left than the fringee's on the Right, but if Dr. Deanmento gets the nomination, we might see solidarity on the Left. Thankfully, I think Dean scares the hell out of the squishy middle.
110
posted on
12/12/2003 2:38:25 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: The_Eaglet
US Congressional seats. Name them?
111
posted on
12/12/2003 2:40:23 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: SUSSA
True. I have faith. And hope. I love freedom and I love America. I know that a lot of the politicians are not acting in good faith, but I believe we will find more of the straight shooters on the conservative side than we will on the liberal side. I pray to God that this is so.
112
posted on
12/12/2003 2:41:25 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(All your ZOT are belong to us.)
To: onyx
I have a very strong feeling any one of these third parties, Nader's party included, will be casting protest votes against Bush. Mark my words. No party should be in power if all they care about is one single solitary issue. The "flavor of the month" this go around seems to be getting rid of Bush because of Iraq.
To: BigSkyFreeper
Which begs the question. Who in their right mind would vote for someone that would RAISE TAXES?! So far, Bush has yet to raise mine.
To: BigSkyFreeper
Iraq is an excuse. They just hate Bush. Iraq might not be such a huge issue 6 or 9 months from now.
People usually vote for or against candidates. I think Bush is worth voting for. More people like him than hate him, and there's nothing to like about Dean. Independent's for Dean? A scant few.
115
posted on
12/12/2003 2:46:10 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: onyx
They are more local than that. :)
Some candidates and election winners are listed
here.
To: Jim Robinson
" Want to make the Supreme Court and all of the federal courts more conservative? Vote out the commie-loving rat bastards! Want to leave the godless America hating Democrats on the bench, vote Rat or third party."Wasn't Sandra Day O'Conner appointed by a Republican president? She voted to up-hold this un-Constitutional legislation signed into law by a Republican president. The same Republican president that says he supports the renewel of the ban on so-called "assault weapons". The amazing part is that GWBush even acknowledged that he understood this CFR legislation was un-Constitutional when he signed it. Do you think he just plain forgot about his sworn oath to "Protect and Defend" the Constitution of the United States of America?
I understand that you, Mr. Robinson, served in our armed forces, and took a similar oath. Do we honor our sworn oath by voting for a man that we know has already broken his own oath and disregarded his duty? Do you regard your own sworn oath as lightly as George W. Bush?
To: onyx
They just hate Bush. Iraq might not be such a huge issue 6 or 9 months from now.I tell all my liberal friends this when the topic of discussion is Iraq. :)
To: Godebert
Yes, I believe that is so about O'Connor. But all the same, the Democrats are guaranteed to name a baby killing, gun grabbing, UN loving, God hating homosexualist as her replacement. I'm acting on my oath and defending the Constitution by not allowing that to happen.
119
posted on
12/12/2003 3:00:16 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(All your ZOT are belong to us.)
To: Godebert
Look, why in the world would anyone in his right mind want to turn control of the government back over to the Democrats? We just threw them out of a seventy year run of flushing the country down the toilet. Doesn't make a lick of sense to hand it back to them. Are you people nuts or just plain crazy? Serious question.
120
posted on
12/12/2003 3:03:58 AM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(All your ZOT are belong to us.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson