Skip to comments.
Andy Grove: US losing High-Tech Lead, Jobs going to China and India
Forbes ^
Posted on 10/10/2003 1:04:57 PM PDT by BlackJack
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
To: Destro
Hey, why not slavery then. Just find some country in Africa where people are made to work at the point of a gun, just for food perhaps. In reality, there is only a slight difference between that and what is going on in China, where the people are "free" to earn $3 a day.
To: oceanview
I agree. Give it time. Sex slavery has come back into this century with force-industrial institutional slavery is not far behind.
42
posted on
10/11/2003 4:58:02 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: harpseal
Yes I agree that the importer should bear the cost of inspection etc. The problem is that the inspection is going to be done at the port of entry, which is too late if a nuclear device is shipped in and detonated.
I don't know how this can really be prevented. Such devices are unfortunately going to become more common.
43
posted on
10/11/2003 7:02:15 PM PDT
by
Voltage
To: Voltage
Currently the USCG a fine service where the men and women put their lives on the line for su daily has some inspections that are done on ships at sea. The US Customs Service inspects many containers at the port of loading. It is not unreasonable for a ship carrying containers to be inspected by the Coast Guard at sea and if it has containers which were not inspected and
Sealed with a specific seal that prevents tampering of nay type then have the ship diverted to a secure anchorage a safe distance offshore where inspections can be done. Otherwise inspections may be done at sea provided the shipping company is cooperative. The burden must be placed on the importer.
At present both of these inspections are vbeing done with teh USCG personnel boarding ships at seal to inspect and US Customs service personnel are inspecting at foreign ports. These operations need to be expanded. Clearly the cost of hiring the appropriate personnel needs to be borne by those who are bringing things into the USA. Perhaps importers to save money could arrange a port of entry inspection syation on an unpopulated spot of US territory on either coast That is perhaps a good alternative use for Vieques or maybe an Island off the Coast of Maine.
44
posted on
10/11/2003 8:18:38 PM PDT
by
harpseal
(stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: BlackJack
If you cant trust the chinese communists providing us with all of our manufacturing and high tech needs in the furture, then you dont believe in free trade.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson