Skip to comments.
U.S. wants defensive missile system in Europe against Iran; report
Drudge Report ^
| 10/9/03
Posted on 10/09/2003 11:53:21 AM PDT by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: tractorman
Why aren't we bombing the Iranian Uranium enrichment facilities. Why do we wait for Israel to do that? The Iranian government has been our archenemy from day one.
To: philosofy123
Im with you! I dont see why we dont just blow it up and blame it on an Iranian nuke accident.
To: tractorman
Im with you! I dont see why we dont just blow it up and blame it on an Iranian nuke accident.Great minds think alike, you sly devil!
To: per loin
Correct!
U.S. wants defensive missile system in Europe against Iran; report
The New 2004 (Sunni) 'EU' could call the defendive missile system "Death to the Shiite"...??
/sarcasm
24
posted on
10/09/2003 1:18:31 PM PDT
by
maestro
To: philosofy123
"Why aren't we bombing the Iranian Uranium enrichment facilities."
One problem might be, that some of Iran's Uranium enrichment sites are under heavily populated cities, and we're not sure where. So blowing up nuclear reactors is only part of the problem.(which is what Israel has been talking about doing)
25
posted on
10/09/2003 1:21:20 PM PDT
by
nuconvert
( Stop thinking about it and do it.)
To: per loin
Are there no men left in Europe willing to defend it? Europe is willing to fight to the last American to defend itself.
26
posted on
10/09/2003 1:31:25 PM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: Cobra64
And they spit on American graves buried in their wretched soil. All of 'em?
To: Southack
and then they will have nowhere to point their finger if they do get hit by Iran... Well... Is Iran planning on hitting Europe? I haven't heard anything like this. Jeez, Iran has enough trouble just trying to keep down its own insurrection and worrying about its territorial integrity without pestering Europe with a missile strike. Seems like if they wanted to threaten anyone it would be Israel.
To: Pyro7480
To not piss Russia off for having yet another missle defense system errected.. espically in their backyard.
To: areafiftyone
Here's some more on this (probably where Drudge is getting his info):
US 'mulls Iran defence missiles' (source- News.com.au)
From correspondents in Berlin October 10, 2003
THE US government is considering stationing defensive missiles in a number of European countries against a potential attack from Iran, Germany's Sueddeutsche newspaper reports.
The daily quotes a high-ranking US diplomat as saying the Americans want to develop a defensive missile network with Europeans, but doubted whether a deal could be reached quickly by NATO.
Because of these concerns, Washington may pursue bilateral agreements with individual European countries for the deployment, in 2006, of anti-ballistic systems in exchange for economic aid, the Sueddeutsche said.
The diplomat acknowledged that such an approach could lead to new tensions with some European countries following the rift over the US-led Iraq war, the report says.
US defence policy specialist Benjamin Schreer of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs told the newspaper that Romania and Bulgaria could be the "first choices" for such agreements with the US.
To: per loin
Don't forget about all the U.S. troops there. We like to see a small nuke land in one of our bases? How would you feel about tens of thousands of American's dying because we were unwilling to spend the money to protect them?
To: Prodigal Son
To: Prodigal Son
To: areafiftyone
Countries accepting the missiles would be rewarded by the U.S. with economic assistance, according to the report in the Sueddeutsche Zeitung citing unnamed U.S. State Department officials. Long live the empire!
34
posted on
10/09/2003 2:10:33 PM PDT
by
BureaucratusMaximus
(if we're not going to act like a constitutional republic...lets be the best empire we can be...)
To: Almondjoy
I don't see why we should be spending our tax money to have our troops in Europe protecting Europeans.
35
posted on
10/09/2003 2:12:08 PM PDT
by
per loin
To: areafiftyone
The most likely target would actually be Israel.
I would suggest deployment on the soil of our new best friend Iraq.
36
posted on
10/09/2003 2:15:17 PM PDT
by
toast
To: areafiftyone
Is this thing going to destroy the missles entirely? 'Cause if it's cheaper to simply deflect them into France... (or even if it costs a bit extra...)
37
posted on
10/09/2003 2:17:24 PM PDT
by
Stultis
To: per loin
Or having a large medical base in Germany that is serving to keep American G.I.'s alive? I'm not sure you understand the whole concept of logistics.
To: areafiftyone
Why not just destroy Iran? Wouldnt it be cheaper?
39
posted on
10/09/2003 2:37:39 PM PDT
by
Delbert
To: tractorman
"Im with you! I dont see why we dont just blow it up and blame it on an Iranian nuke accident." Nah, blame it on Israel and when TSHTF we'll have an excuse to clean out the whole middle east once and for all.
40
posted on
10/09/2003 3:31:27 PM PDT
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson