Skip to comments.
Don't boycott the L.A. Times. Boycott their advertisers!
October 6,2003
| Calebcar
Posted on 10/06/2003 4:15:21 PM PDT by calebcar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
To: calebcar
Per U.S.A. Today On Saturday, the Times reported that Schwarzenegger had grabbed a CNN intern's buttocks in the early 1980s and had made improper advances to an actress and an assistant director on the movie set of Twins in the late 1980s. The newspaper reported Sunday that 1,000 readers had canceled subscriptions to protest the stories.
21
posted on
10/06/2003 5:56:45 PM PDT
by
archy
(Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
To: Graybeard58
I could and would boycott the advertizers if they are companys whose products are sold nation wide and would also let those companies know that I was boycotting their product and why.It certainly can’t hurt, but I don’t think it will help much. So many companies are advertisers that any boycott will have to be superficial; it is simply imposable to not use all the products advertised by a major newspaper. Like you I do not live in L.A. or subscribe to the L.A. Times. And, like you, I am frustrated by the blatant partisanship of the L.A. Times. I wish there were something we could do but I guess we will have to hope that the people of California do the right thing.
22
posted on
10/06/2003 6:30:31 PM PDT
by
Friend of thunder
(No sane person wants war, but oppressors want oppression.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson