Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEW ZEALAND: Smacking kids faces ban by 2005
The Dominion Post, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND ^ | October 7 2003 | Leah Haines

Posted on 10/06/2003 1:28:45 PM PDT by shaggy eel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: GSWarrior
IMHO, Ivory tastes better than Palmolive.
61 posted on 10/07/2003 7:46:08 PM PDT by hollywood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
Tuesday 7 Oct 2003
Dr Muriel Newman
Press Releases -- Social Welfare
(view HTML version at: http://www.act.org.nz/item.jsp?id=24773 )

ACT New Zealand Social Welfare Spokesman Dr Muriel Newman today urged the Government not to use a recent UN report as a stepladder back onto its anti-smacking platform, in light of reports that smacking children may be illegal within two years.

"This report, from an out of touch UN committee, advocates banning smacking - a move that could prove problematic for New Zealand society," Dr Newman said.

"Banning smacking will not solve our child abuse problem. Child abuse is already illegal, but that does not stop the abusers. Banning smacking will simply make law-abiding parents too afraid to discipline their children. The abusers, meanwhile, will continue to ignore the law.

"The reality is that a law banning smacking will be unenforceable. It could result in decent parents being labelled abusers, children threatening parents and neighbours spying on neighbours - with police inundated with calls about smacked bottoms and slapped wrists.

"Smacking is a child-rearing tool that is, more often than not, used as a last resort. If the Ministers championing this move had children of their own, they would understand that children sometimes need to be brought back into line and given boundaries.

"Sadly, the Government is not banning smacking to address child abuse, but is simply following an ideological path. If Labour were truly serious about lowering abuse rates, then it would be examining the factors associated with abuse - such as family breakdown and long-term welfare dependency," Dr Newman said.

62 posted on 10/07/2003 7:47:24 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
As long as we can still smack their sassy butts when the occasion demands.
63 posted on 10/08/2003 7:37:39 AM PDT by Terriergal ("multipass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
ping
64 posted on 10/08/2003 1:51:09 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson