L.A. Slimes Faces Anger for Schwarzenegger Coverage

Reuters ^ | 10/5/2003 | Reuters Staff

[TontoKowalski]

Mostly, the newspaper's reporters had just made "cold calls" to people working in the film industry and women listed in the credits of movies starring Schwarzenegger, he said.

What's this? A "fishing expedition"... A "witch hunt"

[Rockitz]

I specifically made no appeals to criminal acts against the Slimes, which is what you have described.

[Pagey]

"...Los Angeles Times Editor John Carrol so saith: The newspaper had been working on its initial front-page story for seven weeks and did not receive tips from any of Schwarzenegger's political foes..."

Of course Arnolds handlers put this information out.........Mmmm Hmmm......John Carrol is a self-damned LIAR, and it's all about Tom McClintock (getting the vote for him and) winning anyway. The L.A. Slimes lost my subscription during the Clintoon era. This is the work of AH-REE-AHHH-NA and Davis' handlers, if by anybody.

[Liz]

Since the LA Slimes wants to discuss Hollyarped's sexual proclivities, let's have a story on the notorious " casting couch."

What do powerful producers demand from starlets who want movie parts?

What do starlets give producers in return for the chance at stardom?

Let's have the whole Hollyweird sex story. Not just the one the Slimes wants to print about Arnold.

[weegee]

Did they ever run a front page story on this groping incident?