Posted on 10/02/2003 12:49:42 PM PDT by Mike Haas
"have come to trust without question, names such as Stephen Halbrook"
Meanwhile, NRA attorney Stephen Halbrook says, to the judge, last week, oral arguments, in a so-called "Second Amendment" lawsuit:
THE COURT: THE GOVERNMENT CAN PUT RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.MR. HALBROOK: YOUR HONOR, WE ARE HERE WANTING TO REGISTER HANDGUNS. WE ARE NOT HERE WANTING UNRESTRICTED ACCESS. WE'RE NOT HERE ASKING TO CARRY THEM, OTHER THAN IN THE HOME.
THE COURT: YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE GOVERNMENT CAN IMPOSE REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS?
MR. HALBROOK: YES, YOUR HONOR. YES, YOUR HONOR.
[See: http://KeepAndBearArms.com/Silveira/Halbrook.asp for the full transcript, with annotations.]
Thus, we see what happens when you "trust without question". Do be sure and read that full annotated transcript. It was annotated by the attorney doing the legal research and writing on the Silveira case. This will be a nice way to compare the two minds, how they work, how prepared they are, etc. Let us know what you learn, Mike. I also welcome your thoughts on my own analysis of your hero. Surely you can think of something to say, right?
Ooops. Gosh, Mike. Looks like your wonder boy is, well, CLUELESS.
Your silence sure is loud these days. Can't blame you.
The reply to Mr. Kates is already done, as well. Shame you went and helped him make himself look bad, too. Got any more friends whose reputations you'd like to screw up?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.