Posters banned for bias against gays

The Independent, London ^ | Sep 29, 03 | Paul Waugh

[wku man]

"It is clear, overt discrimination and yet the law can do nothing. If they had a policy banning black couples or Jewish couples, they wouldn't be allowed to get away with it. Why should they with gay couples?"

Because black and Jewish couples aren't, as a group, disgusting, immoral, degenerative, disease spreading perverts like you and your ilk, homo. I wouldn't want you at my resort, either.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

[Porterville]

I usually have as my tag line "I spell stuff wrong sometimes, get over yourself, you are not that great"... this applys to you, get over yourself, you probably have worse problems then my spelling... loser.

[DLfromthedesert]

I think you meant to say, "looser" :)

[Porterville]

Exactly my point, who cares how one spells once in a while?? We make mistakes, I venture that if I look into anybody's financial management skills I will find interest rates at 12+ percent for credit cards or even auto loans or who didn't refi their house... who cares, really, we all lack skills or are careless at times, particularly on a forum where we can vent.

[WillowyDame]

yeah phoney halle's hubby was treated there for sex addiction.

[WillowyDame]

don't waste your breath.

write the way you write, babe.

truly intelligent people will figure out what you are saying with typos and wrong spellings and all!

[Labyrinthos]

Sounds like Sandals also discriminates against threesomes.

Not when I was there. :-)

[RightOnline]

"If they had a policy banning black couples or Jewish couples, they wouldn't be allowed to get away with it. Why should they with gay couples?"

Ohfercryinoutloud..................give me just one, big, honkin' break here.

[Polycarp]

Posters banned for bias against gays

Honest to God, I thought this was a thread about Free Republic posters being banned for posting threads about the facts regarding homosexual activity.

[F.J. Mitchell]

Agreed. It should definately be treated.