Skip to comments.
White House 'warned over Iraq claim'(Was the Novak story shopped around?)
BBC ^
| July9,2003
Posted on 09/29/2003 5:34:27 PM PDT by Dog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: moonshawn
What fact is wrong? Where are the facts?
41
posted on
09/29/2003 6:19:15 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: moonshawn
civil and constructive comments full of truth like mine. You wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and smacked you in the face.
42
posted on
09/29/2003 6:19:50 PM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: moonshawn
Thanks ..........and I'm going to enjoy you getting nuked by the Viking Kitties..
43
posted on
09/29/2003 6:20:12 PM PDT
by
Dog
(This wednesday is my birthday and I officially become older than dirt....)
To: moonshawn
But the real crime was invading Iraq on false pretense.
The REAl crime, pup, is having an American edukashunal system that doofi such as you (that's plural of doofus, FYI) out into society.
44
posted on
09/29/2003 6:21:16 PM PDT
by
ErnBatavia
(Why do the Flag postage stamps peel off upside down..infiltrators?)
To: moonshawn
special agent for the CIA What is a "Special Agent for the CIA"?
Do they get a brght shiny badge and a whistle.
To: moonshawn
What fact is wrong?You've stated no facts.
46
posted on
09/29/2003 6:23:58 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: moonshawn
Welcome to Free Republic,, member since 9-30-03
47
posted on
09/29/2003 6:24:21 PM PDT
by
Iowa Granny
(Conservative women LIKE men!)
To: moonshawn
I question being called a "dumbass". Purchase a mirror!
48
posted on
09/29/2003 6:25:16 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: Dog
Moonsh*t has been microwaived
49
posted on
09/29/2003 6:25:25 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(Who Would the Terrorist Vote For ??????)
To: Dog
Viking kitties.....Very quick kitties as well. I only got to bash a couple of posts. :)
50
posted on
09/29/2003 6:26:29 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: M. Thatcher
51
posted on
09/29/2003 6:27:36 PM PDT
by
jdontom
(BacktheBadge)
To: meyer
I'll ping you the next time we trap a troll....I promise.
52
posted on
09/29/2003 6:28:29 PM PDT
by
Dog
(This wednesday is my birthday and I officially become older than dirt....)
To: Shermy
BTW
# 8 should be Valerie Plame
Not "Palme"
53
posted on
09/29/2003 6:29:34 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: nutmeg
bttt
54
posted on
09/29/2003 6:29:46 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
To: Dog
I'll ping you the next time we trap a troll....I promise.That's OK - as long as I can get one or two in, I'm happy. I spent too much time on usenet - its fun to counter-bait. :^)
55
posted on
09/29/2003 6:30:08 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: Iowa Granny
Welcome to Free Republic,, member since 9-30-03I think a revision is in order - "member until 9-30-03"
56
posted on
09/29/2003 6:31:53 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: moonshawn
In order to punish Wilson and to get him to keep his mouth shut , they outed his wife as a special agent for the CIA endangering her life.ROFLMAO! Yeah, right -- he's been punished -- with elevation from an obscure former diplomat to a media darling -- and he's really keeping his mouth shut with lines like "I want to see Karl Rove in handcuffs."
They "endangered" Wilson's wife? Do you know what she actually does, that you can make that statement? For all we know, she doesn't do anything more dangerous than push papers.
If "they" knew about Wilson's report before the SOTU address, why would "they" risk ignoring it? Wilson wasn't under any gag order; he's not even a government employee. And why did Wilson wait until seven months after the SOTU, and four months after the start of the war, to spill the beans? Was he being held against his will in a cellar under the White House?
Try thinking -- it might clear the cobwebs out of your skull.
To: Dog
Are you saying 'the CIA official' *was the wife of this team*???
58
posted on
09/29/2003 6:55:40 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(DONT PUT CALI ON CRUZ CONTROL & VOTE YES ON 54!)
To: WOSG
Exactly
To: CyberAnt
Yeah, but their lies never really hurt the left, the media just buries it and moves on to the next smear.
Our statesman had that 70% of Iraqis support the US invasion in page 5 in tiny type 4 days back. Today they SCREAM about Iraqi dissident stories unreliable; the NYTimes article that is most unreliable and extremely biased against Bush, Chalabi etc.
The bias goes on.
60
posted on
09/29/2003 6:58:12 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(DONT PUT CALI ON CRUZ CONTROL & VOTE YES ON 54!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson