Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bruce Herschensohn does ad for Tom McClintock
California Republican Assembly ^ | Sept. 27, 03 | California Republican Assembly

Posted on 09/27/2003 12:40:33 PM PDT by churchillbuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-232 next last
To: TommyUdo
And in winning has a shot a fixing the State's financial problems.

If Arnold doesn't even have the political and moral courage to join the referendum campaign to overturn the illegal alien license law (and he doesn't) then he's not going to have the backbone to "fix the state's financial problems" Because fixing those problesm (without a tax increase) will require decisions that will make politically correct groups angry. So far, he's shown no willingness to challenge any politicallly correct doctrine.

121 posted on 09/27/2003 5:52:30 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: TommyUdo
And in winning has a shot a fixing the State's financial problems.

If Arnold doesn't even have the political and moral courage to join the referendum campaign to overturn the illegal alien license law (and he doesn't) then he's not going to have the backbone to "fix the state's financial problems" Because fixing those problesm (without a tax increase) will require decisions that will make politically correct groups angry. So far, he's shown no willingness to challenge any politicallly correct doctrine.

122 posted on 09/27/2003 5:52:32 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: TommyUdo
And in winning has a shot a fixing the State's financial problems.

If Arnold doesn't even have the political and moral courage to join the referendum campaign to overturn the illegal alien license law (and he doesn't) then he's not going to have the backbone to "fix the state's financial problems" Because fixing those problesm (without a tax increase) will require decisions that will make politically correct groups angry. So far, he's shown no willingness to challenge any politicallly correct doctrine.

123 posted on 09/27/2003 5:52:33 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: TommyUdo
And in winning has a shot a fixing the State's financial problems.

If Arnold doesn't even have the political and moral courage to join the referendum campaign to overturn the illegal alien license law (and he doesn't) then he's not going to have the backbone to "fix the state's financial problems" Because fixing those problesm (without a tax increase) will require decisions that will make politically correct groups angry. So far, he's shown no willingness to challenge any politicallly correct doctrine.

124 posted on 09/27/2003 5:52:37 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: TommyUdo
And in winning has a shot a fixing the State's financial problems.

If Arnold doesn't even have the political and moral courage to join the referendum campaign to overturn the illegal alien license law (and he doesn't) then he's not going to have the backbone to "fix the state's financial problems" Because fixing those problesm (without a tax increase) will require decisions that will make politically correct groups angry. So far, he's shown no willingness to challenge any politicallly correct doctrine.

125 posted on 09/27/2003 5:52:50 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Bob
See post #1. Deja-vu?
126 posted on 09/27/2003 8:20:32 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Nonsense. We keep answering these silly questions time and time again, but that doesn't stop you diehard BUSTAMANTE supporters from continuing to attack Arnold.
Arnold said he opposes driver's licences to illegals and plans to do something about it AFTER he gets elected. He is keeping his eye on the ball: getting elected. If you don't get elected, you can't push programs through

"Silly" question, eh? Glad to see where your priorities lie. I'll ignore your crack about Bustamante supporters and type this slowly once again. It's a no-brainer, so please try to follow along:

Unless the referendum passes (and it will, despite Arnold's reluctance to endorse it), the d**n drivers' licenses get ISSUED TO ILLEGALS ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2004. If the referendum succeeds, the law is IMMEDIATELY STAYED UNTIL THE MARCH 2004 election and thus the licenses probably NEVER get issued, as the law will undoubtedly pass.

Now let's all try that again, together:

1. No referendum, DRIVER'S LICENSES TO ILLEGALS GET ISSUED.
2. Referendum passes, LAW STAYED, NO LICENSES ISSUED.

Arnold is AGAINST the referendum. Doing something about it AFTER election is TOO LATE, we only have a LIMITED TIME TO COLLECT THE SIGNATURES.

Sorry to shout for emphasis, but Good Lord, is that simple enough now??

127 posted on 09/27/2003 8:42:13 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Proving the PEE-ROT mentality is alive and well in CA.

Yeah, that rich guy Arnold thinks he can walk in and wow voters without offering any specific plans or policies. Fortunately, we learned from the Perot episode to beware of such flim-flam

128 posted on 09/27/2003 8:52:35 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; Bob; All
, the d**n drivers' licenses get ISSUED TO ILLEGALS ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2004.

CORRECTION: This is a typo. The licenses will be issued JANUARY 1, 2004...BTW, just in time to be used fraudulently in the March 2004 elections!

Sorry about the typo. I was so mad I couldn't see straight when I typed this. I'm outta here now. Enough exasperation for one night.

129 posted on 09/27/2003 8:59:00 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Your interpretation of Mcclintock's ideas lacks reason and balance.
130 posted on 09/27/2003 10:18:50 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Duramaximus; churchillbuff
The organizer of the "October surprise" was Bob Mullholland, dumocrap agent provocateur.
131 posted on 09/27/2003 10:22:18 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RS
"But there aren't enough of them (conservatives) to elect anyone..."

Wrong. Look for the post-election polling data. I am willing to bet that "conservatives" will constitute at least 40% of the vote in the recall.

132 posted on 09/27/2003 10:25:09 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

New Chamber of Commerce Poll: Recall leading 53-41%, Arnold 35%, Cruz 31%, Tom 17%
133 posted on 09/27/2003 10:26:06 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff; Hoverbug; Reagan Man; William Creel; Bobsat; Sabertooth; nopardons; ...
ping
134 posted on 09/27/2003 11:50:37 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
It's a good thing they're radio ads, it seems like everytime I saw Bruce Herschensohn, he looked like he slept in his clothes and needed some grooming tips.
135 posted on 09/28/2003 12:00:42 AM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
SO WHY WON'T ARNOLD SUPPORT THE REFERENDUM?

Bush/Rove told him not to.

I'll take Arnold for Governor and trade McClintock for Bush....

136 posted on 09/28/2003 12:12:47 AM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
I guess McClintamante stuffed some singles in Herschensohn's g-string.
137 posted on 09/28/2003 12:16:29 AM PDT by bootyist-monk (Thunder makes all the noise; lightning gets the job done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper; FairOpinion; Hildy
Arnold is AGAINST the referendum.

No, truthkeeper, Arnold isn't against the referendum; he just doesn't support it.

If he ever were to say that he was against the referendum, his supporters wouldn't be able to keep telling us how "strongly opposed" Arnold is to SB60.

It's a rock-and-a-hard-place situation. If he supports the referendum, he ticks off the liberals. If he opposes it, he ticks off the conservatives. He's got a win-win going by doing neither.

138 posted on 09/28/2003 7:07:40 AM PDT by Bob (http://www.TomMcClintock.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Bob
That is pretty Clintonian...and gutless...of him, is it not?
139 posted on 09/28/2003 7:09:27 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
That is pretty Clintonian...and gutless...of him, is it not?

No, not at all -- we've got to WIN!!! That's all that matters. You must not have gotten the memo.

There's a quote on another thread where Arnold says we've got to forget about the whole Democrat/Republican thing. I'll ping you to it. It's pretty disturbing.

140 posted on 09/28/2003 7:16:42 AM PDT by Bob (http://www.TomMcClintock.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-232 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson