Skip to comments.
William Safire: Why have the Clintons anointed Wesley Clark?
IHT Online ^
| September 23, 2003
| William Safire
Posted on 09/23/2003 6:09:02 AM PDT by joesnuffy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
09/23/2003 6:09:03 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
To: joesnuffy
2
posted on
09/23/2003 6:10:18 AM PDT
by
LRS
To: joesnuffy
Good to see a decent Safire column. He seems to do a good one about once a year. This is right on the money.
3
posted on
09/23/2003 6:15:11 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: LRS
"Ah, but the strawberries! That's -- that's where I had them.
4
posted on
09/23/2003 6:17:53 AM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: joesnuffy
To: joesnuffy
Bill and Hill just can't lose control. But will Hill run in '04 or '08? Who's betting?
6
posted on
09/23/2003 6:20:01 AM PDT
by
sarasota
To: LRS
Precious bodily fluids...
7
posted on
09/23/2003 6:21:11 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: joesnuffy
The General taught economics - well no wonder the military hasn't been able to keep track of the wares.
This guy has no original thoughts of his own, that clip that shows him calling CNN to see if he could do an interview says it all.
He gets hourly scripts from the Clinton fedayeen.
So what do the Clintons have on this guy to make him play this role?
To: LRS
Sterling Hayden at least had charisma.
9
posted on
09/23/2003 6:24:09 AM PDT
by
SBprone
To: StockAyatollah
That "Chaplain Yee" from Guantanamo was also probably high in HIS class at West Point...
10
posted on
09/23/2003 6:29:03 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: TADSLOS
YES!
It finally hit me yesterday just whom it was Gen Clark reminded me of: Gen. Jack D. Ripper...
11
posted on
09/23/2003 6:32:59 AM PDT
by
LRS
To: SBprone
Sterling Hayden at least had charisma. True!
12
posted on
09/23/2003 6:36:21 AM PDT
by
LRS
To: LRS
This thread is why I love FR. You guys crack me up.
To: TADSLOS
sapped and impurified.
To: sarasota
I'm betting '08. They are planning to have the dems lose in '04. If they lose in a landslide, the hildebeast will work to enrage the already frenzied left into thinking she is their last and only hope. If it's a close election, she'll work to foster the idea that it was another stolen election, again setting herself up as savior of the party.
Nothing is left to chance, as her public-outings-by-invitation-only show. Clark has been thrown in as an attempt to make sure the dems splinter and lose.
15
posted on
09/23/2003 7:03:34 AM PDT
by
kenth
To: joesnuffy
If Dean gets the nomination and makes a respectable showing in the general election (even losing) it will de-Clintonize the Democratic Party.
16
posted on
09/23/2003 7:19:03 AM PDT
by
Salman
(Mickey Akbar)
To: Salman
What's a respectable showing ? 30 percent ?
To: joesnuffy
I love the smell of 1968 in the morning. If Clinton pushes Hillary or Clark into the nomination, over the dead body of Dean, will be like Humphrey over McCarthy. The butcher of Kosovo will not win the hearts and minds of the anti-war left.
18
posted on
09/23/2003 7:51:27 AM PDT
by
js1138
To: kenth
How does Hillary intend to beat Jeb in '08?
19
posted on
09/23/2003 7:54:15 AM PDT
by
js1138
To: billorites
20
posted on
09/23/2003 7:54:57 AM PDT
by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
