Skip to comments.
HECKLED: Actor tries to court environmentalists amid protest
SFGate.com ^
| 9/22/03
| Carla Marinucci
Posted on 09/22/2003 8:37:57 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:43:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: Jimmy Valentine's brother
This sounds very efficient. Both in terms of capital and efficiency, it's not.
41
posted on
09/22/2003 10:53:18 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: Carry_Okie
It isn't prettyFunny how the whacko's always push for things that cannot work, and fight tooth and nail against anything that does.
You'd think that they where trying to destroy civilization or something.
42
posted on
09/22/2003 10:58:33 AM PDT
by
dinasour
To: dinasour
In this case, the whackos include Arnold. He chose RFKJr to get this thing written. He owns this stupidity now.
43
posted on
09/22/2003 11:11:42 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: Carry_Okie
Actually I wasn't QUITE as confused as I'd thought.
Your reply related to Arnold's greenie policy. And that makes sense IN THAT the thread is led off by a fuel-cell-car article.
But my "Cruz is worse" post, specifically, came in response to one mentioning gay adoption and abortion.
I do think that Arnold is substantially less lefty than Cruz on those issues, as with most issues, even if Tom is vastly better.
44
posted on
09/22/2003 11:49:52 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: pogo101
There is no substantive difference between Arnold's positions on the environment and those of Gray Davis or Cruz Bustamante. In analyzing the document, I have yet to find a single attribute I haven't heard coming out of the left.
45
posted on
09/22/2003 12:02:29 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: Carry_Okie
I heard somewhere that to convert California completely to Hydrogen powered vehicles, the electricity equivalent from 55 new nuclear power plants would be needed to produce the fuel.
>>>No, it's not cheaper. You need to add significant amounts of energy to get the hydrogen. The rest of your understanding is correct, but there are many more issues with implementing hydrogen than just its efficiency.
To: ambrose
Was that when the injuns were handing over the suitcases of casino money?
>>Arnold's boys were heckling McClintock just the other day...
To: Carry_Okie
It's going to take me awhile to reach an informed opinion on the environmental issue.
48
posted on
09/22/2003 12:10:25 PM PDT
by
pogo101
To: BurbankKarl
Sounds about right. They never talk about what they'll do with all the carbon deposits resulting from the process either.
49
posted on
09/22/2003 12:11:41 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: Carry_Okie
There is no substantive difference between Arnold's positions on the environment and those of Gray Davis or Cruz Bustamante. And most other issues, for that matter.
50
posted on
09/22/2003 12:30:51 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson