1 posted on
09/17/2003 11:09:59 PM PDT by
Timesink
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Timesink
Tihs is vey sirees.
30 posted on
09/18/2003 5:46:51 AM PDT by
Charles Henrickson
(Tag lnie onitopal, pinterd atfer yuor nmae on psot)
To: Timesink
Tihs is HGUE!
32 posted on
09/18/2003 5:47:29 AM PDT by
Charles Henrickson
(Tag lnie onitopal, pinterd atfer yuor nmae on psot)
To: Timesink
Ecsuxe me, I manet to say:
Tihs is HGUH!
33 posted on
09/18/2003 5:49:16 AM PDT by
Charles Henrickson
(Tag lnie onitopal, pinterd atfer yuor nmae on psot)
To: Timesink
Wow. Taht ralely was azaming! I raed the whloe thnig wihtuot misisng a baet!
34 posted on
09/18/2003 6:26:52 AM PDT by
pgkdan
To: Timesink
The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Actually, I think the mind reads patterns of letters, and self-corrects to known spellings when it sees them. I noticed that I had to work a little harder in deciphering the misspellings to figure out what they should have been.
But that's probably too simplistic -- the mind also uses context to differentiate between words which could be "corrected" more than one way. We basically know what the word "should be" because we are able to perceive the basic thrust of the thought before it's completed.
For example, let's just randomize the order of the sentence:
The deos ervey a total rset mses and be you wrod wlohe can be raed it porbelm can. huamn bcuseae be mnid not raed lteter by Tihs is istlef, but the the wouthit as a.
The context is gone, and now it's much more difficult to tell what's going on. It looks much more like random typing.
36 posted on
09/18/2003 6:38:20 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: Timesink
ma I degglo ni?
To: Timesink
You know what's scary? I really can read that stuff. Is this what's going on in our schools? No wonder the kids can't pass tests. No wonder the TEACHERS can't pass the tests.
38 posted on
09/18/2003 6:47:10 AM PDT by
mrtysmm
To: Timesink
Correction.
Real readers may be able to do that.
Not too many of us left.
39 posted on
09/18/2003 6:53:10 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Timesink
Yes, but deos it wrok for lgnoer wrods lkie alhrsiibsnamnasiiasttnetedm?
To: Timesink
Of course, we could all simply be getting "trained" to compensate for the piss-poor spelling and grammar that pervades the web......
To: Timesink
Garet nwes! Now I can crsue on Fere Rpebluic wtih wlid anabodn!
To: Timesink
What will this mean for ebonics?
I'm sure Sheila Jackson-Lee will believe this Cambridge University study to be a white racist ploy aimed at erradicating the African-American influence on the English language.
To: Timesink
My head hurts from trying to read all of this.
57 posted on
09/18/2003 7:37:39 AM PDT by
najida
(He who is without baggage can cast the first Samsonite.)
To: Timesink
Hey tihs is gaert!
So lnog sepllchkceer!! LOL!
To: Timesink; .45MAN; The Thin Man
Colo! I lveo thsi psot!
59 posted on
09/18/2003 7:59:17 AM PDT by
dansangel
(***Never Forget!****)
To: harpseal
pnig!
To: Timesink; Camachee
Deos tihs wrok whit wrdos lkie aitcatiolrun?
I dnot tihnk so.
To: Timesink
Sudons lkie bl*sulht.
To: Timesink
bmup
To: Timesink
Vyre Igetrnitse. Btu I tkinh teh lneght of teh wdor mtretas as deos teh etxnet of teh mxingi.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson