Skip to comments.
Bush on warpath over UN's shock report on Iran A-bomb (Dubya is Angry!)
The Daily Telegraph ^
| 09/07/2003
| Con Coughlin
Posted on 09/06/2003 6:09:24 PM PDT by Pubbie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-190 last
To: dinok
So what's GW going to do...send Powel up to the UN with a harsh letter?Yes.
And announce he giving 15 Billion dollars each to South America, Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Antartica to cure all those who infected each other with AIDs.
Then all the world will live in peace and harmony (if Israel shows some restraint.)
181
posted on
09/07/2003 4:52:25 AM PDT
by
putupon
(Wake up and smell the RINOs.)
To: Pubbie
It's really quite simple, yet we don't have any leadership to solve the problem. Announce a unilateral blockade of Iran and North Korea and if any nation wishes to try to continue trade with those nations, all of their assets are seized in the U.S. Bet the results would be quick and dramatic.
182
posted on
09/07/2003 5:27:32 AM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(Shenandoah and Blue Ridge will re-emerge as the investment of the 21st Century....)
To: TXnMA
Howdy ! and Welcome back to God's Country !
Yup..ain't it nice to have grandkids big enough to do the handcrank style of ice cream making ? I remember,back when I was a youngun, our parents and grandparents would set up the ice cream maker-then let us kids take turns-even making a contest of who could last the longest..lol..daggum..I miss them days.
Have a good one...TongRat
183
posted on
09/07/2003 5:28:37 AM PDT
by
TongRat
("Dang it Rat ! make the daggum pliers bite !")
Comment #184 Removed by Moderator
To: All
Pipe dreams on kicking the U.N. out of the U.S. are fun, eh? Heck, the Prez can't even get an up or down vote in the Senate on a judicial nominee......
To: Pubbie
Some day, a major city is going to go up in a mushroom cloud. I wonder how the frenchy french men will feel, if it is Paris?
To: Conservative Iowan
"You have nicely illustrated Ann Coulter's point about liberals from her book, "Treason.""
Wow, Ask a question, get accused of Treason...
Amazing....
To: ClancyJ
To be honest Clancy, the very idea that the nuclear Genie was ever released from the bottle should be troubling for everyone, world wide. The idea that there are Scientists, right now, sitting in labs, in this country included, producing weapons meant solely to wipe out civilians, should trouble us all.
The point I was making, all the hyberboli directed at me for simply asking the question asside, is this, as long as we maintain an arsenal of WMD (Nuclear/Biological/Chemical) we are hardly in any position to act "Holier than Thou" when others seek to develop the same. If WMD are Bad, then how are We Good continuing to produce them?
Do I like the idea that these rogue countries are developing WMD? No, not in the slightest. However, Mankind, as a whole, has NEVER developed a weapon that it hasn't eventually used. There's no escaping that grim reality.
The longer we keep upping the ante, rattling our sabres, and demanding other countries fit their cultures into our ideals, the closer we get to our worst fears coming to pass. Everytime we pre-emtively strike another country, regardless of our "justifications", we lower the bar.
Think I'm wrong? Look at how some around here address ANYONE who even slightly disagrees with Bush. They are accused of Treason, or hating America, and thereby committing Treason.
Where does this sort of thinking eventually lead? Draw it out to it's natural conclusion.
To: Orion78
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/977433/posts You see Russia stands strictly for expartriation of all hot fuel from Iran. So iranians cann't use it as raw matherial for plutonium extruction (also that task are more complicated then just enriching of uranium).
189
posted on
09/07/2003 7:38:00 PM PDT
by
RusIvan
To: Lord_Baltar
So, with your theory, we - the superpower of the world and the richest country - are to be unprotected?
We cannot change history. The weapons were developed, then the nuclear race was on. We had to protect ourselves from the Russians.
We also cannot change the fact that all these small nations will try and get nuclear weapons for the same reasons we did - or to attack us.
Yet, we cannot afford to trust these people that are set on killing us. We cannot afford to take a first strike any longer either - unless you are willing to ante up 100,000 American lives to prove to those that hate us and never believe any good of us that we are justified in fighting back. Of course, they will still not think we are justified - no matter what we do. So, we have thrown away 100,000 lives, and wrecked havoc on some cities in the U.S. to make others think well of us.
Sounds crazy to me. I would prefer to be a realist and protect ourselves. We have been the "good" guys over all these years and the hate mongerers out there spred lies that were believed.
190
posted on
09/07/2003 10:17:58 PM PDT
by
ClancyJ
(It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-190 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson