Skip to comments.
Scientists admit: we were wrong about Ecstasy damage on the brain
Observer ^
| 09/07/03
| Jo Revill
Posted on 09/06/2003 5:14:37 PM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: Mr. Mojo
"D*mn it, Captain - I'm a scientist - not a chemist!"
To: jude24
They're chemically similar. Hillary Clinton and Britney Spears are chemically similar, but I don't think I would get them confused. :)
To: mlmr
I'll take your experienced word for it.
To: July 4th
This junk caused the death of a friend's 19 year old son; I'm sure you're right that it DOES have permanent effects on those that survive.
To: DLfromthedesert
This junk caused the death of a friend's 19 year old sonI doubt anybody knows exactly what chemicals he ingested---just as Prohibition-era drinkers never really knew what they were drinking (unless they'd distilled it themselves).
45
posted on
09/09/2003 7:53:24 AM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: MrLeRoy
Oh. I'm sure that news will be comforting to someone who lost her child.
To: DLfromthedesert
I'm sure it would be no comfort whatsoever---but it's important to understand if we want to prevent more such deaths.
47
posted on
09/09/2003 10:12:28 AM PDT
by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson