CA Voter Guide - No Arnold either?

Rabid Republican

[Eala]

No- you have to accept some severely restrictive spending limits and other assorted campaign finance garbage to get into the voter guide.

So the "official guide" is Politically Correct and biased. Sounds like a third-world election to me.

[TheAngryClam]

Welcome to California, gringo.

[rdf]

I'm starting to think Tom might just pull this out!

cheers,

Richard F.

[also from Ventura County CA]

[CyberAnt]

I think they left off the people because there were too many to list - and the expense of listing 135 people upped the cost of the election probably by a few hundred thousand .. just my guess.

However, who was it that told the LIE about Tom not being able to get on the voter guide because he was too stupid to fill out his form correctly .. that person needs some serious FReeping.

What I really don't like - how the people are listed. It would have been easier if they has just made a straight alphabetical listing. If they want people to find Arnold - he's on the last page. I wonder how many will just vote for Tom who is listed several pages before that ..??

[CyberAnt]

Prop 53 - maybe Tom can tell us - I haven't checked his website.

[Rabid Dog]

I sent his senate website an e-mail on it - we'll see what he says. I'll try to remember to ping ya.!

[Rabid Dog]

Me too!

By the way, we have a Ventura County forum where we discuss local issues - could always use more posters! Freepmail me and I'll send you the details.

[CyberAnt]

thanks!

[polyiguana]

No, you tried to claim that McClintock didn't want to be bound by the campaign finance laws that allow placement in the voter pamphlet (Proposition 34). All I'm saying is that McClintock wanted to be bound by those laws (see article), but filled out the forms incorrectly, as the article states.

And to say that I'm an "Arnold shill" is preposterous, as I have posted probably the most information on the SB 60 referendum that McClintock is leading so far.

[polyiguana]

OK, maybe not the most, I take that back, truthkeeper started the whole ball rolling to begin with.

[TheAngryClam]

I said nothing of the sort.

I merely stated the truth: that to get into the voter guide, one has to accept restrictive campaign spending limits. How you can possibly divine "Tom McClintock is doing X" from the following statement is beyond me:

No- you have to accept some severely restrictive spending limits and other assorted campaign finance garbage to get into the voter guide.

The "no" refers directly to the question up above, about ARNOLD "screwing up." I said no, he made no screw up, and that for him to get into the voter guide, he'd have to abide by those restrictions.

And your interest in SB60 is not dispositive of your Arnold shilling, as you seemed quite ready to jump on McClintock from nowhere and then attempt to pin it onto my statement. A lot of Arnold fanatics will tell you they like lower taxes, or hate abortion too, both of which are as far from Arnold's platform as humanly possible.

[DoctorZIn]

Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

[Eala]

Welcome to California, gringo.

LOL. I moved out over 20 years ago.

But I moved to The Peoples' Soviet of Washington, aka The Evergreed State, which is just about as bad.